Meditative Proving - was rubric for renal failure
Posted: Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:10 pm
Dear Dr Vijayaragavan
As you well know, Homeopathy is based on experimentations of highest order and careful observations.
Whilst I appreciate that there are many forces in the Universe that we know nothing about let alone understand, and while appreciating that there were some 'matching' symptoms between provings which were done both according to Hahnemann's instructions and separately through 'meditative proving', I would regard them as unreliable and unscientific and therefore they should have no room in our materia medica or repertory.
You see the basis of homeopathy is Symptom Similarity. That is to say if a substance can create a set of symptoms in the healthy, it can cure a similar set of symptoms in the sick. Hence the reason behind our process of proving.
This is far away from what happens in Meditative proving and therefore our scientific basis is lost.
Also in a critical enquiry, one can produce the records of the symptoms produced through traditional provings. What can be shown from meditative proving?
As you know we are continuously criticised for using high dilutions. If the critics ever found out that the so called basis of the choice of a remedy is through meditation, the problem is increased significantly. It would certainly be indefensible in a court of law.
Rgds
Soroush
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of g.vijaya ragavan
Sent: 12 February 2013 13:54
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] rubric for renal failure
hi,
you just go through the MEDITATIVE MATERIA MEDICA
With regards,
Dr.G.Vijayaragavan
Cell: 9442454179
________________________________
From: HomeoDidact >
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, 12 February 2013 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Minutus] rubric for renal failure
Hi,
who wrote this? where?
Thanks
Rafy
________________________________
________________________________
As you well know, Homeopathy is based on experimentations of highest order and careful observations.
Whilst I appreciate that there are many forces in the Universe that we know nothing about let alone understand, and while appreciating that there were some 'matching' symptoms between provings which were done both according to Hahnemann's instructions and separately through 'meditative proving', I would regard them as unreliable and unscientific and therefore they should have no room in our materia medica or repertory.
You see the basis of homeopathy is Symptom Similarity. That is to say if a substance can create a set of symptoms in the healthy, it can cure a similar set of symptoms in the sick. Hence the reason behind our process of proving.
This is far away from what happens in Meditative proving and therefore our scientific basis is lost.
Also in a critical enquiry, one can produce the records of the symptoms produced through traditional provings. What can be shown from meditative proving?
As you know we are continuously criticised for using high dilutions. If the critics ever found out that the so called basis of the choice of a remedy is through meditation, the problem is increased significantly. It would certainly be indefensible in a court of law.
Rgds
Soroush
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of g.vijaya ragavan
Sent: 12 February 2013 13:54
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] rubric for renal failure
hi,
you just go through the MEDITATIVE MATERIA MEDICA
With regards,
Dr.G.Vijayaragavan
Cell: 9442454179
________________________________
From: HomeoDidact >
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, 12 February 2013 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Minutus] rubric for renal failure
Hi,
who wrote this? where?
Thanks
Rafy
________________________________
________________________________