Vitamin C - ascorbate..........
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:59 am
In your opinion:-)
And sometimes in the opinion of others - but not the opinions of those writig the scientific papers.
In fact the one that you quote directly as opposed to by interpretation of another, is this one, and it complies with the tens of thousands of research articles in the national Library o medicine - which are not calling a spade a fork either:
(Ester-C is sodium ascorbate)
This figures as what you use intravenously is not very relevant except for some added sodium, since ALL intravenous preparations have dissociated ions and have sodium ions.
But what is used orally, matters and as I said earlier, the *acidic* nature (with more positive eleectrones for REOX reactions) is more useful - as found in ascorbic acid but not in sodium ascorbate:
Sodium is a mineral, he is referring to sodium ascorbate.
which is what makes it *better* than sodium ascorbate. The postiive ions matter.
I had forgotten the weight issue, which also would indeed make ascorbic acid (with two H+ atoms, atomic weight of 1 each) much lighter than sodium ascorbate (with one Na+ atom of atomic weight 23).
namely sodium ascorbate
as compared with ascorbic acid
which is the dissociated aspect that is chemically relevant in either cae.
Cathcart is correct and what he says is confirmed in multiple other studies.
There were many assumptions made in the past, which were based on les information than is now available.
For example, this one about sodium, ascribed to Klenner more than forty years ago:
That is 2220 mg of sodium in addition to his normal sodium intake from food.
This anecdotal comment is irrelevant.
There are many people who can not safely ingest 2220 extra mg of sodium per day.
Urine pH is irrelevant and not connected to sodium intake.
................
Elsewhere in your email you assume I am a vet and that animals have no need of additiona ascorbic acid and that I would not be using it.
These assumptions are just as incorrect as the others you made.
I am not a vet. I trained in both human and animal homeopathy (and attended medical school and graduate scool in the medical sciences, my bachelor's degree was in animal sciences.)
I work as a veterinary homeopath - am not licensed as a vet or doctor.
Sick animals need extra Vitamin C just as much as sick people do.
I use it DAILY in my work with animals, in the MORE effective form, which is ascorbic acid, for the reasons as quoted in your email by Dr Cathcart, and for other reasons including results.
Unlike Klenner, my client's animals are very sick, and cannot tolerate a lot of extra sodium as Klenner could.
I am indebted to your post to help me understand even more why ascorbic acid provides such superior results to sodium ascorbate - the relative *weights* of the two options, due to the positive ions involved.
Thanks for that.
Namaste,
Irene
REPLY TO: only
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."
And sometimes in the opinion of others - but not the opinions of those writig the scientific papers.
In fact the one that you quote directly as opposed to by interpretation of another, is this one, and it complies with the tens of thousands of research articles in the national Library o medicine - which are not calling a spade a fork either:
(Ester-C is sodium ascorbate)
This figures as what you use intravenously is not very relevant except for some added sodium, since ALL intravenous preparations have dissociated ions and have sodium ions.
But what is used orally, matters and as I said earlier, the *acidic* nature (with more positive eleectrones for REOX reactions) is more useful - as found in ascorbic acid but not in sodium ascorbate:
Sodium is a mineral, he is referring to sodium ascorbate.
which is what makes it *better* than sodium ascorbate. The postiive ions matter.
I had forgotten the weight issue, which also would indeed make ascorbic acid (with two H+ atoms, atomic weight of 1 each) much lighter than sodium ascorbate (with one Na+ atom of atomic weight 23).
namely sodium ascorbate
as compared with ascorbic acid
which is the dissociated aspect that is chemically relevant in either cae.
Cathcart is correct and what he says is confirmed in multiple other studies.
There were many assumptions made in the past, which were based on les information than is now available.
For example, this one about sodium, ascribed to Klenner more than forty years ago:
That is 2220 mg of sodium in addition to his normal sodium intake from food.
This anecdotal comment is irrelevant.
There are many people who can not safely ingest 2220 extra mg of sodium per day.
Urine pH is irrelevant and not connected to sodium intake.
................
Elsewhere in your email you assume I am a vet and that animals have no need of additiona ascorbic acid and that I would not be using it.
These assumptions are just as incorrect as the others you made.
I am not a vet. I trained in both human and animal homeopathy (and attended medical school and graduate scool in the medical sciences, my bachelor's degree was in animal sciences.)
I work as a veterinary homeopath - am not licensed as a vet or doctor.
Sick animals need extra Vitamin C just as much as sick people do.
I use it DAILY in my work with animals, in the MORE effective form, which is ascorbic acid, for the reasons as quoted in your email by Dr Cathcart, and for other reasons including results.
Unlike Klenner, my client's animals are very sick, and cannot tolerate a lot of extra sodium as Klenner could.
I am indebted to your post to help me understand even more why ascorbic acid provides such superior results to sodium ascorbate - the relative *weights* of the two options, due to the positive ions involved.
Thanks for that.
Namaste,
Irene
REPLY TO: only
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."