suppression of gonorrhoea
Posted: Tue Jan 17, 2012 12:09 pm
Read Kent!
He had a case of a woman with such sx.
These had started soon after her wedding.
On interviewing the husband he discovered that he had had gonorrhoea. Treatment for both solved the problem!
Rgds
Soroush
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Sent: 16 January 2012 21:51
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] suppression of gonorrhea
i mean cases when after suppressing gonorrhea with antibiotics soon after or several years later very unplesant symptoms or problems appear which cannot be removed by any means of official medicine. for example, pain and burning in inguinal region, lower abdomen, male genitals. many times people who had gonorrhea suppressed with antibiotics later have rheumatic problems, prostate problems, impotency. maybe it is only a coincidence. there is a rubric in the repertory "after suppressed gonorrhea". i am trying to understand if it is only a coincidence or there are ties between suppression of gonorrhea and later problems which appear out of nothing and cannot be explained or treated by medicine.
Michael
--- On Mon, 16/1/12, Shannon Nelson wrote:
From: Shannon Nelson
Subject: Re: [Minutus] suppression of gonorrhea
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, 16 January, 2012, 22:37
I also remember reading--but can't remember who the writer was--that what has/had been taken as consequences of suppressed gonorrhea was in fact simply "the disease following its natural course." For whatever that might or might not be worth... Anyone remember the reference?
I suppose the only difference it would make is if one became sidetracked in trying to "antidote" a prior remedy, rather than simply continue treating the developing picture.
Shannon
He had a case of a woman with such sx.
These had started soon after her wedding.
On interviewing the husband he discovered that he had had gonorrhoea. Treatment for both solved the problem!
Rgds
Soroush
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Michael
Sent: 16 January 2012 21:51
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Minutus] suppression of gonorrhea
i mean cases when after suppressing gonorrhea with antibiotics soon after or several years later very unplesant symptoms or problems appear which cannot be removed by any means of official medicine. for example, pain and burning in inguinal region, lower abdomen, male genitals. many times people who had gonorrhea suppressed with antibiotics later have rheumatic problems, prostate problems, impotency. maybe it is only a coincidence. there is a rubric in the repertory "after suppressed gonorrhea". i am trying to understand if it is only a coincidence or there are ties between suppression of gonorrhea and later problems which appear out of nothing and cannot be explained or treated by medicine.
Michael
--- On Mon, 16/1/12, Shannon Nelson wrote:
From: Shannon Nelson
Subject: Re: [Minutus] suppression of gonorrhea
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, 16 January, 2012, 22:37
I also remember reading--but can't remember who the writer was--that what has/had been taken as consequences of suppressed gonorrhea was in fact simply "the disease following its natural course." For whatever that might or might not be worth... Anyone remember the reference?
I suppose the only difference it would make is if one became sidetracked in trying to "antidote" a prior remedy, rather than simply continue treating the developing picture.
Shannon