Minutus and Hahnemann's teachings
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 9:46 am
When I first discovered this list, some years ago, it was a time when
David Little, Chris Gillen and Joy Lucas were regular contributors (to
name but a few). Reading their posts was like opening a dirty window
and letting the bright sun shine in: healing ceased to be a mishmash
method of “give a bit of this and bit of that and throw in a bit of
the other for good measure” and became a clearly defined practice
where healing could be truly evaluated and there were methods for
going forward when the outcome wasn’t the perfect healing scenario
that we all hope for. I realised that the limitations of this system
of healing weren’t in “its” abilities, but in my own ability to master
it. I could so easily have condemned the system and gone back to a
mishmash approach, criticising Hahnemann as I did so. That line of
thinking would have been far easier on the ego: let’s face it who
wants to acknowledge that they are a failure and don’t have what it
takes to become a good Homeopathic practitioner? Looking around,
across the years, it seems that part of the reason that people condemn
Hahnemann is because of ego, but also because of laziness: people
still have the instant fix mentality of allopathic medicine and don’t
want to put in the work that is needed to truly master Homeopathy as
taught by Hahnemann, and to work a full case. Is it really too much
to ask that those who don’t wish to master the system stay silent and
permit those that do wish to master it have a list devoted to
Hahnemann’s methods? It really is beyond me why people are so
determined that this list should be about anything and everything.
Such an attitude shows a total discourtesy to other members of the
list, but perhaps this is just a reflection of the general discourtesy
that is shown across society as a whole now? Having said that, there
doesn’t seem to be the same discourtesy shown in the Homeopathic
groups on Facebook, though I personally find Facebook a pain and would
much rather use Yahoo groups.
The last time I emailed David Little he said it wouldn’t be long
before he was back on the internet as visible as he used to be.
Here’s hoping he returns to this group soon. For those who are new to
Homeopathy, and unaware of David’s work, take a look at his website:
http://www.simillimum.com/index.php David has taken the time to
truly understand Hahnemann's teachings. His course archives are an
absolute bargain and one of the best investments that anyone
interested in homeopathy can make.
Kerry
David Little, Chris Gillen and Joy Lucas were regular contributors (to
name but a few). Reading their posts was like opening a dirty window
and letting the bright sun shine in: healing ceased to be a mishmash
method of “give a bit of this and bit of that and throw in a bit of
the other for good measure” and became a clearly defined practice
where healing could be truly evaluated and there were methods for
going forward when the outcome wasn’t the perfect healing scenario
that we all hope for. I realised that the limitations of this system
of healing weren’t in “its” abilities, but in my own ability to master
it. I could so easily have condemned the system and gone back to a
mishmash approach, criticising Hahnemann as I did so. That line of
thinking would have been far easier on the ego: let’s face it who
wants to acknowledge that they are a failure and don’t have what it
takes to become a good Homeopathic practitioner? Looking around,
across the years, it seems that part of the reason that people condemn
Hahnemann is because of ego, but also because of laziness: people
still have the instant fix mentality of allopathic medicine and don’t
want to put in the work that is needed to truly master Homeopathy as
taught by Hahnemann, and to work a full case. Is it really too much
to ask that those who don’t wish to master the system stay silent and
permit those that do wish to master it have a list devoted to
Hahnemann’s methods? It really is beyond me why people are so
determined that this list should be about anything and everything.
Such an attitude shows a total discourtesy to other members of the
list, but perhaps this is just a reflection of the general discourtesy
that is shown across society as a whole now? Having said that, there
doesn’t seem to be the same discourtesy shown in the Homeopathic
groups on Facebook, though I personally find Facebook a pain and would
much rather use Yahoo groups.
The last time I emailed David Little he said it wouldn’t be long
before he was back on the internet as visible as he used to be.
Here’s hoping he returns to this group soon. For those who are new to
Homeopathy, and unaware of David’s work, take a look at his website:
http://www.simillimum.com/index.php David has taken the time to
truly understand Hahnemann's teachings. His course archives are an
absolute bargain and one of the best investments that anyone
interested in homeopathy can make.
Kerry