Newsletter 10.10.2011-www.vithoulkas.com
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:34 pm
From: Evgenia Mitsaki [mailto:evgenia@vithoulkas.com]
Sent: 10 October 2011 10:41
To: Evgenia Mitsaki
Subject: Fwd: Newsletter 10.10.2011-www.vithoulkas.com
http://www.vithoulkas.com , http://www.vithoulkas.edu.gr , http://www.vithoulkasbooks.gr
Newsletter 10.10.2011
Homeopathic Newsletter sent by G. Vithoulkas,
A Reply to Rheumatology Journal for its misconceived trial on homeopathy
Dear Ηomeopath,
Last year, in November 13, 2010, the prestigious Journal of Rheumatology published an article with the following heading:
"Homeopathy has clinical benefits in rheumatoid arthritis patients that are attributable to the consultation process but not the homeopathic remedy".
http://rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/ ... 4.abstract
George Vithoulkas responded with an answer to Rheumatology Journal but they refused to publish it.
The article was then sent to another peer review journal "HOMEOPATHY" and here is the answer for those who are interested in defending homeopathy.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar ... 1611000555
It is important that we (Homeopaths) do not allow misconceptions and misunderstandings concerning homeopathy to circulate without criticism, especially when they are published in prestigious Medical Journals.
International Academy of Classical Homeopathy
Sent: 10 October 2011 10:41
To: Evgenia Mitsaki
Subject: Fwd: Newsletter 10.10.2011-www.vithoulkas.com
http://www.vithoulkas.com , http://www.vithoulkas.edu.gr , http://www.vithoulkasbooks.gr
Newsletter 10.10.2011
Homeopathic Newsletter sent by G. Vithoulkas,
A Reply to Rheumatology Journal for its misconceived trial on homeopathy
Dear Ηomeopath,
Last year, in November 13, 2010, the prestigious Journal of Rheumatology published an article with the following heading:
"Homeopathy has clinical benefits in rheumatoid arthritis patients that are attributable to the consultation process but not the homeopathic remedy".
http://rheumatology.oxfordjournals.org/ ... 4.abstract
George Vithoulkas responded with an answer to Rheumatology Journal but they refused to publish it.
The article was then sent to another peer review journal "HOMEOPATHY" and here is the answer for those who are interested in defending homeopathy.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar ... 1611000555
It is important that we (Homeopaths) do not allow misconceptions and misunderstandings concerning homeopathy to circulate without criticism, especially when they are published in prestigious Medical Journals.
International Academy of Classical Homeopathy