re: postings
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2011 9:00 am
To be honest, I frequently wondered if some of the people who repeatedly
insisted that none homeopathic methods were homeopathic, were in fact not
homeopathic students or homeopaths at all, but were trolls out to
destabilise the list.
You say Sue that no one was promoting, they were just explaining or not
understanding, and yet I remember people repeatedly having the issues
explained to them, even having the specific aphorisms pointed out, but they
were still adamant that Hahnemann was wrong and that they didn't need to
listen - that their methods were right and they would continually air those
methods on list. From where I am standing that is promotion: the promotion
of none homeopathic methods to list members.
If we look for a moment at the mission statement of the list:
"The aim of MINUTUS discussion group is to share useful information on
classical and Hahnemannian homeopathy."
That mission statement does not include conspiracy theories, polypharmacy,
none classical methods, vaccination (I do of course understand that
vaccinosis can be discussed in relation to a particular case, but not on
mass discussion about vaccine info - there are lists for that), etc.
Yes occasionally people will go off topic, but this list got to the stage
where it was more off topic than on. I am completely, utterly and absolutely
puzzled as to why anyone who genuinely wants homeopathy to prosper, would be
so determined not to stick to the topic of the list, especially when there
are so many lists out there were anything goes. As I have said before, it
shows a total lack of courtesy for other list members that have come here
because of the mission statement.
Kerry
insisted that none homeopathic methods were homeopathic, were in fact not
homeopathic students or homeopaths at all, but were trolls out to
destabilise the list.
You say Sue that no one was promoting, they were just explaining or not
understanding, and yet I remember people repeatedly having the issues
explained to them, even having the specific aphorisms pointed out, but they
were still adamant that Hahnemann was wrong and that they didn't need to
listen - that their methods were right and they would continually air those
methods on list. From where I am standing that is promotion: the promotion
of none homeopathic methods to list members.
If we look for a moment at the mission statement of the list:
"The aim of MINUTUS discussion group is to share useful information on
classical and Hahnemannian homeopathy."
That mission statement does not include conspiracy theories, polypharmacy,
none classical methods, vaccination (I do of course understand that
vaccinosis can be discussed in relation to a particular case, but not on
mass discussion about vaccine info - there are lists for that), etc.
Yes occasionally people will go off topic, but this list got to the stage
where it was more off topic than on. I am completely, utterly and absolutely
puzzled as to why anyone who genuinely wants homeopathy to prosper, would be
so determined not to stick to the topic of the list, especially when there
are so many lists out there were anything goes. As I have said before, it
shows a total lack of courtesy for other list members that have come here
because of the mission statement.
Kerry