Minutus

The pseudo-skeptics have been very busy entering as many negative things as they can into the wikipedia page on homeopathy but you can now go and rate it for accuracy and reliability - just scroll to the bottom of the page to do so.

Please pass the information on.

--
Kind regards,

Fran Sheffield

instead of rating the whole entry, is it possible to amend what is written so that it is accurate?
Sue

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Fran Sheffield wrote:

Yes, I gave the Wikipedia homeopathy page a very poor rating as soon as I noticed the ratings system. That page has gotten so much worse than I remember, even.

Sue, you can amend it, but the Randi-ites are lurking in the shadows waiting to undo any edits that make homeopathy seem remotely plausible.

The only silver lining is that their writing is so poor and is so obviously biased that I don't think it supports their cause very well.

Hart Matthews
Durham, North Carolina

Could not see an option to give it a poor rating, Jean

the problem with wikipedia is they have a known bias against homeopathy.
yes, we can do in and edit, but they re-edit back again asap. this is an old problem
with them. and so many people do not know they can easily access the history of the
changes which would give them information from our point of views.
so go for it, try to make the changes and see how long they last.
t
________________________________

oh we amend and its removed, over and over
Sheri

At 02:42 AM 8/8/2011, you wrote:
Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com/ &
http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/
ONLINE/Email classes in Homeopathy; Vaccine Dangers; Childhood Diseases
Next classes start Friday September 9

Ok, everyone, thanks. Best option then is for as many of us as possible to scroll right down to the bottom and give it the poorest rating, otherwise its just a waste of our valuable time.
Sue
www.nottinghamhomeopathy.com