Minutus

Has anyone got a fuller picture of Radon than in Scholten’s Elements?
Thanks
Rochelle Marsden Msc, RSHom, MNWCH, AAMET

Registered with the Society of Homeopaths

EFT(Advanced) Practitioner

www.southporthomeopathy.co.uk

Dear Rochelle
See if you can get an actual proving - do not rely on what Scholten writes about elements from his imaginations and theorising!
The corner stone of homeopathy is its properly conducted provings - as per Hn's instructions and notes.

Take that away and you do not have 'Symptom Similarity' and without symptom similarity, you do not have homeopathy.
Rgds

Soroush
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of rochelle Marsden
Sent: 21 July 2011 14:53
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Minutus] Radon
Has anyone got a fuller picture of Radon than in Scholten’s Elements?
Thanks
Rochelle Marsden Msc, RSHom, MNWCH, AAMET

Registered with the Society of Homeopaths

EFT(Advanced) Practitioner

www.southporthomeopathy.co.uk

OK so does anyone know who has done a proving of Radon? I have looked on the web and can’t find any.
Thanks
Rochelle Marsden Msc, RSHom, MNWCH, AAMET

Registered with the Society of Homeopaths

EFT(Advanced) Practitioner

www.southporthomeopathy.co.uk
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of finrod@finrod.co.uk
Dear Rochelle
See if you can get an actual proving - do not rely on what Scholten writes about elements from his imaginations and theorising!
The corner stone of homeopathy is its properly conducted provings - as per Hn's instructions and notes.

Take that away and you do not have 'Symptom Similarity' and without symptom similarity, you do not have homeopathy.
Rgds

Soroush
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of rochelle Marsden
Has anyone got a fuller picture of Radon than in Scholten’s Elements?
Thanks
Rochelle Marsden Msc, RSHom, MNWCH, AAMET

Registered with the Society of Homeopaths

EFT(Advanced) Practitioner

www.southporthomeopathy.co.uk

Just a reminder that many of the early remedies were learned from the clinical reactions to them.
One might look at Radon the same way as there is much information on that gas.
tanya
________________________________

Hi Rochelle,

I don't have any proving info, but you might contact either Silvie Gowan, or one of the pharmacies (below) about it:
Radon
2001
Silvie Gowan
silvie@waitrose.com
Radon available from
Helios, Leonardo, Remedia, Freeman´s
Lynn
---------------------------------
Thursday, July 21, 2011 6:14 PM
--
Imagine Peace

Checkout www.provings.info

You can find out what provings have been done on a substance.

Roger
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "rochelle Marsden" wrote:

Thanks I had already checked this and there is nothing
Rochelle
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of R
Checkout www.provings.info

You can find out what provings have been done on a substance.

Roger

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com , "rochelle Marsden" > wrote:

Rochelle, one of the methods to know more about any medicine based on Scholten’s method is to improvise for new themes from keywords of series as well as element provided by Scholten right in beginning of each remedy… It’s not necessary this improvisation works right at that time when you start thinking on it but careful analysis of keywords and pondering on it gives as a striking some new theme at times and I too have done it on a few occasions… Many a times the case you have in front of you, if it belongs to that remedy, inevitably acts as catalyst as well as source to work on that new theme…

Radon is technically completing both Gold Series as well as Uranium Series, so even Scholten has provided keywords of both Uranium Series as well as Gold Series in beginning of its description apart from providing keywords of Stage 18 for Radon… So you can try and ponder on these keywords in totality to form an improvising picture or situation…

This method for sure will irk a lot to those who demean Scholten’s work as theorizing… As a check for them who use such demeaning words for such great work, his methods are equally applicable to many salts that are already proved earlier, and provide much greater information about these medicines now… Aur Met, Cuprum, Iodium are just a few examples…

So its pity who demean such great work and also such a great personality in shadows and guise of saying that they are actually not ready to move out from armpits of Hahnemann…

Proving of medicines not yet proved from periodic table is undoubtedly going to provide more clarity on them in reverse way as it happened for those which already were proved but Scholten provided for them astounding new dimensions and clarity…

Varun

http://eyevarun.blogspot.com

Yes have checked it out according to Scholten’s keywords for the series and the stage.
Rochelle Marsden Msc, RSHom, MNWCH, AAMET

Registered with the Society of Homeopaths

EFT(Advanced) Practitioner

www.southporthomeopathy.co.uk
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Varun Gupta
Sent: 24 July 2011 17:10
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: FW: [Minutus] Re: Radon
Rochelle, one of the methods to know more about any medicine based on Scholten’s method is to improvise for new themes from keywords of series as well as element provided by Scholten right in beginning of each remedy… It’s not necessary this improvisation works right at that time when you start thinking on it but careful analysis of keywords and pondering on it gives as a striking some new theme at times and I too have done it on a few occasions… Many a times the case you have in front of you, if it belongs to that remedy, inevitably acts as catalyst as well as source to work on that new theme…

Radon is technically completing both Gold Series as well as Uranium Series, so even Scholten has provided keywords of both Uranium Series as well as Gold Series in beginning of its description apart from providing keywords of Stage 18 for Radon… So you can try and ponder on these keywords in totality to form an improvising picture or situation…

This method for sure will irk a lot to those who demean Scholten’s work as theorizing… As a check for them who use such demeaning words for such great work, his methods are equally applicable to many salts that are already proved earlier, and provide much greater information about these medicines now… Aur Met, Cuprum, Iodium are just a few examples…

So its pity who demean such great work and also such a great personality in shadows and guise of saying that they are actually not ready to move out from armpits of Hahnemann…

Proving of medicines not yet proved from periodic table is undoubtedly going to provide more clarity on them in reverse way as it happened for those which already were proved but Scholten provided for them astounding new dimensions and clarity…

Varun

http://eyevarun.blogspot.com
Thanks I had already checked this and there is nothing
Rochelle
From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com ] On Behalf Of R
Checkout www.provings.info

You can find out what provings have been done on a substance.

Roger

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com , "rochelle Marsden" > wrote:

I am sure that proving the periodic table would "provide astounding
new dimensions and clarity" on Scholten's work, also, in addition
to providing some concrete symptoms to back up the undocumented and sometimes vague assertions in his descriptions.

Wouldnt it be nice to have some concrete materia medica symptoms
for, say, Radon?

Maybe we are all happy with vague imaginative assertions?

Varun, lets skip the ad hominum attacks. We, myself included, have probably all used Scholtens work when there was nothing else available on particular elements, like Radon.

Roger
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Varun Gupta wrote: