Where to ask Ardavan to post his teachings and interactions with him
Posted: Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:36 am
Hi All,
I am just experiementing with ways to post Ardavan's work. I would appreciate your feedback on these venues.
I made my own blog on the HomeopathyWorldCommunity.com. Took 2 minutes On HomeopathyWorldCommunity.com. I posted a report on Ardavan's seminar here:
http://www.homeopathyworldcommunity.com ... r_blogpost
The same report is posted on my site: http://www.homeopathyworldcommunity.com ... there-is-a
Can you access them?
------------------
I made a temporary group on Facebook called case analysis. http://www.facebook.com/note.php?create ... 60226&ap=1 I think this is a viable option for Ardavan if people understand how to subscribe.
If you are on facebook, I would like to know if you can get access to this group and subscribe to it?
________________
I invited Ardavan to the group above, but we could invite people more broadly I think just by advertising it on Minutus. If they subscribe, they will get a notice when there is activity. Also, they can easily find the group in the left column. of there homepage. But as Lynn said, there are oldies (and young ones too I suppose) who do not want to mess with Facebook.
I think I am getting old. To tell you the truth, the operations of Facebook are a bit opaque to me. Also visually it is confusing. Finally, the comments have to be so short. You can hardly have an indepth discussion. I like the HomeopathicCommunityWorld.com better. What do you think? I think it is easy to sign up. Also, it is easy to block off any unwanted interactions (you join a group and it is not interesting, or you quit wanting email notifications of comments on your old blog.)
---------------------------
The problem with both of these settings is people have to become members in the larger community to participate. If Adavan has his own site, he can simply ask people to subscribe and they will receive notice when there is activity (I think). But, even though I was quite interested in Ardavan's work, until very recently, I could not make any sense of his site. The cases that he posed were just not didactically clear. I mean, his reason for posting was not clear. I wonder how much activity he was getting. Also, there is no where to comment. If you miss the one time notice of Minutus, you might not even know about it. But at least everything is clearly organized. You lack that kind of facility on Minutus.org. Facebook provides a wide readership. WWC is limited to the homeopathic community, but no one else is interested in your specialized subject. A plus point for these communal sites is we don't have to work so hard to let people know what is happening. Minutus has the widest readership. Information is disorganized and dispursed. On first contact, I find HWC (with the exception of the blog above) and facebook to be visually confusing just because there is so much on the page. But the HWC is better than facebook. The HWC has a nice seach mechnism which also goes into the text of the topic. It appears that a blog can be clearly organized and the basic material does not have to be lost in massive interactions. But I am not sure about that.
We could try all three venues for a while just to see what happens, but don't want to waste Ardavan's time. No one wants to run around looking for disorganized information or discussions. I would like to get some kind of feedback from Minutus and BIH members.
The current crisis is partially an information glut. For each of us, less not more is needed. Not filtered but organized.
Please tell me what you think about each information venue. I am trying to get your feedback before presenting it to Dr. Ardavan Shadrar. My goal is to set up a framework so that I can learn from him. Obviously, he is not going to teach just me. This is a first step.
Blessings,
Ellen Madono
English: tokyohomeopathy.com
Japanese: tokyohomeopathy.jp
--
English: tokyohomeopathy.com
Japanese: tokyohomeopathy.jp
I am just experiementing with ways to post Ardavan's work. I would appreciate your feedback on these venues.
I made my own blog on the HomeopathyWorldCommunity.com. Took 2 minutes On HomeopathyWorldCommunity.com. I posted a report on Ardavan's seminar here:
http://www.homeopathyworldcommunity.com ... r_blogpost
The same report is posted on my site: http://www.homeopathyworldcommunity.com ... there-is-a
Can you access them?
------------------
I made a temporary group on Facebook called case analysis. http://www.facebook.com/note.php?create ... 60226&ap=1 I think this is a viable option for Ardavan if people understand how to subscribe.
If you are on facebook, I would like to know if you can get access to this group and subscribe to it?
________________
I invited Ardavan to the group above, but we could invite people more broadly I think just by advertising it on Minutus. If they subscribe, they will get a notice when there is activity. Also, they can easily find the group in the left column. of there homepage. But as Lynn said, there are oldies (and young ones too I suppose) who do not want to mess with Facebook.
I think I am getting old. To tell you the truth, the operations of Facebook are a bit opaque to me. Also visually it is confusing. Finally, the comments have to be so short. You can hardly have an indepth discussion. I like the HomeopathicCommunityWorld.com better. What do you think? I think it is easy to sign up. Also, it is easy to block off any unwanted interactions (you join a group and it is not interesting, or you quit wanting email notifications of comments on your old blog.)
---------------------------
The problem with both of these settings is people have to become members in the larger community to participate. If Adavan has his own site, he can simply ask people to subscribe and they will receive notice when there is activity (I think). But, even though I was quite interested in Ardavan's work, until very recently, I could not make any sense of his site. The cases that he posed were just not didactically clear. I mean, his reason for posting was not clear. I wonder how much activity he was getting. Also, there is no where to comment. If you miss the one time notice of Minutus, you might not even know about it. But at least everything is clearly organized. You lack that kind of facility on Minutus.org. Facebook provides a wide readership. WWC is limited to the homeopathic community, but no one else is interested in your specialized subject. A plus point for these communal sites is we don't have to work so hard to let people know what is happening. Minutus has the widest readership. Information is disorganized and dispursed. On first contact, I find HWC (with the exception of the blog above) and facebook to be visually confusing just because there is so much on the page. But the HWC is better than facebook. The HWC has a nice seach mechnism which also goes into the text of the topic. It appears that a blog can be clearly organized and the basic material does not have to be lost in massive interactions. But I am not sure about that.
We could try all three venues for a while just to see what happens, but don't want to waste Ardavan's time. No one wants to run around looking for disorganized information or discussions. I would like to get some kind of feedback from Minutus and BIH members.
The current crisis is partially an information glut. For each of us, less not more is needed. Not filtered but organized.
Please tell me what you think about each information venue. I am trying to get your feedback before presenting it to Dr. Ardavan Shadrar. My goal is to set up a framework so that I can learn from him. Obviously, he is not going to teach just me. This is a first step.
Blessings,
Ellen Madono
English: tokyohomeopathy.com
Japanese: tokyohomeopathy.jp
--
English: tokyohomeopathy.com
Japanese: tokyohomeopathy.jp