Paul Herscu's Giana case
Posted: Sat Jan 15, 2011 5:25 am
His way of working is a kind of Bönninghausen method in which the generalyzed modalities but even more so the generalyzed phenonomena play an important role. These phenomena are used in a combination of actual phenomena and symbolic phenomena, which he takes together when he finds evidence of them in the case.
Giana's case is a good example of it.
I have put some examples of repertorization, several different ones, on my facebook pages in which you can see the way he works, repertororized with rubrics from the Complete Repertory. The larger analysis more a mix of some complete symptoms (location, phenomenon, modality or concomitans), the smaller ones more condensed according to his principles. Mancinella does come foreward clearly.
the link to the first analysis is here:
Regards,
Roger
Giana's case is a good example of it.
I have put some examples of repertorization, several different ones, on my facebook pages in which you can see the way he works, repertororized with rubrics from the Complete Repertory. The larger analysis more a mix of some complete symptoms (location, phenomenon, modality or concomitans), the smaller ones more condensed according to his principles. Mancinella does come foreward clearly.
the link to the first analysis is here:
Regards,
Roger