Truth about Wakefield/Studies/Autism Part 2
Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 8:43 pm
http://www.cryshame.co.uk/index.php?opt ... Itemid=228
there but for the grace of God, go you
and if you want to know more about the MMR research
http://www.cryshame.co.uk//index.php?op ... Itemid=210
Wakefield was NOT a clinician at the Royal Free at that time - the tests were ordered by the Clinicians.
The potential consequences for research due to the GMC?s judgement are:
medical scientists will avoid researching autism, related bowel diseases and especially vaccine safety, for fear they will be treated like the three doctors and endanger their careers
independent research into vaccines could become a no-go area in medical science, apart from research undertaken or sponsored by commercially-driven pharmaceutical manufacturers and government.
Parents considering vaccinating their children would, more than ever before, have only official product information to rely on with no access to independent advice
AND
re: Sir Crispin Davis: non-executive director of GSK.
Sir Nigel Davis: Judge
Sir Crispin Davis, until recently chief executive of Reed Elsevier which owns the Lancet, failed to disclose his own conflicts while denouncing Andrew Wakefield to the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee in March 2004. Sir Crispin failed to disclose either that he was a non-executive director of MMR defendants, GlaxoSmithKline, or that it was his own brother Sir Nigel Davis who had endorsed the Legal Services Commission?s decision to pull the plug on the funding of the case in the High Court 3 days before
This is a very complicated case and those of you who have not investigated thoroughly, without bias, have been misled down the garden path just as intended.
The GMC Hearing against Dr Wakefield and his colleagues Professor John Walker-Smith and Professor Simon Murch has been a political three-ring-circus with the overarching objective of shoring up the UK New Labour government?s defence of the MMR vaccine, whilst attempting to air-brush the children damaged by this vaccine out of history from the start...Jane Bryant
********
A little history BEFORE Wakefield, et all 1998 case study
In the late nineteen eighties, at roughly the same time that the MMR vaccine was introduced by the British government, Dr Andrew Wakefield took up a post at the Royal Free Hospital. He was a well-respected gastroenterologist charged with the task of heading a new department of experimental ... See Moregastroenterology. One of the areas he was to research was the increase in Crohn's disease amongst young people. Wakefield, who had travelled from Canada where he had been researching bowel transplantation, would win awards for his work on the aetiology of Crohn's disease.
In 1992, the British government backhandedly admitted that two of the three types of MMRs they had introduced in the late 1980s had been dropped following serious adverse reactions created by the Urabe strain of mumps virus used. Thousands of children, principally in Canada, Japan and Britain, were made ill by this vaccine. However, in Japan and Canada parents of vaccine damaged children were quickly compensated. In Britain, a morally bankrupt Department of Health sided with the pharmaceutical industry to claim that the adverse reactions suffered by these children were so slight as to be of no consequences. (3)
By 1993, parents seeking help with one aspect of MMR's adverse reactions, a novel new condition of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) followed by regressive autism, began to attend the Royal Free Hospital. As these children began presenting there, Dr Wakefield contacted the DH to inform the head of vaccine and immunology Dr David Salisbury that he considered MMR could be creating a public health crisis and asked for a meeting. It took Salisbury almost six years to arrange such a meeting.
In 1992, the parents of MMR vaccine damaged children began preparing a legal claim against three pharmaceutical companies. By the end of the 1990s the number of parent claimants attached to this lawsuit had grown to around 2,500 and Dr Wakefield had been assigned by the claimants' lawyers to give expert evidence for the parents. In 1998 the Lancet published the case review paper and later that year Deer wrote the first of a series of articles character assassinating previous expert witnesses who had appeared for vaccine damaged claimants and casting doubt upon other cases of vaccine damage claimants.
In 2004 after a decade of organisation and legal finessing, , the first batch of claimants cases, were due to come before the High Court. However, in a move to support the pharmaceutical companies and deny thousands of parents their rights under civil law, legal aid was withdrawn from all the cases. Under a post-industrial New Labour government, a century of civil law enabling citizens to sue powerful interests was snatched from the people.
2004 was the fulcrum year, the year when the legitimate legal claims of citizens against three pharmaceutical companies were turned on their head and a zealous, immoral and criminal campaign was begun by the government and the pharmaceutical companies to wipe out all reports of vaccine damage and anyone who might stand as an expert on this issue. Only months after Deer's Sunday Times attack on Dr Wakefield, Dr Richard Horton whose line manager at Elsevier the Lancet's publisher was Sir Crispin Davis also a board member of GlaxoSmith Kline, published a pulp fiction paperback which lauded the absolute safety of MMR.
more here for anyone who actually has an open mind here
http://www.cryshame.co.uk//index.php?op ... Itemid=217
*********
did you know?
The overall boss for The Sunday Times, James Murdoch, CEO of News International, is also on the Board of MMR vaccine supplier and litigation defendant GlaxoSmithKline. Murdoch?s Glaxo job is expressly to oversee:-
?external issues that might have the potential for serious impact upon the group?s business and reputation?:[James Murdoch takes GlaxoSmithKline role - Chris Tryhorn The Guardian Monday 2 February 2009.
Some have now dubbed the paper "The Sunday Glaxo".
"The principal finding of the Lancet paper was made by Dr Dhillon at The Royal Free Hospital who was and is independent of Dr Wakefield [intestinal pathology (inflammation and lymph node swelling) in children with an autistic spectrum disorder [pervasive developmental disorder] and intestinal symptoms]. This was revealed in the long running General Medical Council proceedings against eminent gastroenterologists Professors Murch, Walker-Smith and Dr Wakefield. "
Papers Supporting the Original Finding
The claim to have found a new inflammatory bowel disease published in the 1998 Lancet paper as ?consistent gastrointestinal findings? involving ?nonspecific colitis? were supported first by a series of peer reviewed papers including in The Lancet itself:-
Furlano R, Anthony A, Day R, Brown A, Mc Garvey L, Thomson M, et al. ?Colonic CD8 and T cell filtration with epithelial damage in children with autism.? J Pediatr 2001;138:366-72.
Sabra S, Bellanti JA, Colon AR. ?Ileal lymphoid hyperplasia, non-specific colitis and pervasive developmental disorder in children?. The Lancet 1998;352:234-5.
Torrente F., Machado N., Perez-Machado M., Furlano R., Thomson M., Davies S., Wakefield AJ, Walker-Smith JA, Murch SH. ?Enteropathy with T cell infiltration and epithelial IgG deposition in autism.? Molecular Psychiatry. 2002;7:375-382
Wakefield AJ, Anthony A, Murch SH, Thomson M, Montgomery SM, Davies S, Walker-Smith JA. ?Enterocolitis in children with developmental disorder.? American Journal of Gastroenterology 2000;95:2285-2295
Ashwood P, Anthony A, Pellicer AA, Torrente F, Wakefield AJ. ?Intestinal lymphocyte populations in children with regressive autism: evidence for extensive mucosal immunopathology.? Journal of Clinical Immunology, 2003;23:504-517.
Papers Replicating The Original Finding
Another series of papers replicated the findings of The Royal Free Hospital London?s 1998 Lancet paper which journalist Brian Deer and The Sunday Times have falsely claimed is discredited:-
Gonzalez, L. et al., ?Endoscopic and Histological Characteristics of the Digestive Mucosa in Autistic Children with gastro-Intestinal Symptoms?. Arch Venez Pueric Pediatr, 2005;69:19-25.
Balzola, F., et al., ?Panenteric IBD-like disease in a patient with regressive autism shown for the first time by wireless capsule enteroscopy: Another piece in the jig-saw of the gut-brain syndrome?? American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2005. 100(4): p. 979- 981.
S. Walker, K. Hepner, J. Segal, A. Krigsman ?Persistent Ileal Measles Virus in a Large Cohort of Regressive Autistic Children with Ileocolitis and Lymphonodular Hyperplasia: Revisitation of an Earlier Study? (last accessed June 2007) (paper submitted for publication)
Balzola F et al . ?Autistic enterocolitis: confirmation of a new inflammatory bowel disease in an Italian cohort of patients.? Gastroenterology 2005;128(Suppl. 2);A-303.
excerpted from http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/ ... eplicated/
Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com/ & http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/
ONLINE/Email classes in Homeopathy; Vaccine Dangers; Childhood Diseases
Next classes start December 2 & 3 and January 6 & 7
there but for the grace of God, go you
and if you want to know more about the MMR research
http://www.cryshame.co.uk//index.php?op ... Itemid=210
Wakefield was NOT a clinician at the Royal Free at that time - the tests were ordered by the Clinicians.
The potential consequences for research due to the GMC?s judgement are:
medical scientists will avoid researching autism, related bowel diseases and especially vaccine safety, for fear they will be treated like the three doctors and endanger their careers
independent research into vaccines could become a no-go area in medical science, apart from research undertaken or sponsored by commercially-driven pharmaceutical manufacturers and government.
Parents considering vaccinating their children would, more than ever before, have only official product information to rely on with no access to independent advice
AND
re: Sir Crispin Davis: non-executive director of GSK.
Sir Nigel Davis: Judge
Sir Crispin Davis, until recently chief executive of Reed Elsevier which owns the Lancet, failed to disclose his own conflicts while denouncing Andrew Wakefield to the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee in March 2004. Sir Crispin failed to disclose either that he was a non-executive director of MMR defendants, GlaxoSmithKline, or that it was his own brother Sir Nigel Davis who had endorsed the Legal Services Commission?s decision to pull the plug on the funding of the case in the High Court 3 days before
This is a very complicated case and those of you who have not investigated thoroughly, without bias, have been misled down the garden path just as intended.
The GMC Hearing against Dr Wakefield and his colleagues Professor John Walker-Smith and Professor Simon Murch has been a political three-ring-circus with the overarching objective of shoring up the UK New Labour government?s defence of the MMR vaccine, whilst attempting to air-brush the children damaged by this vaccine out of history from the start...Jane Bryant
********
A little history BEFORE Wakefield, et all 1998 case study
In the late nineteen eighties, at roughly the same time that the MMR vaccine was introduced by the British government, Dr Andrew Wakefield took up a post at the Royal Free Hospital. He was a well-respected gastroenterologist charged with the task of heading a new department of experimental ... See Moregastroenterology. One of the areas he was to research was the increase in Crohn's disease amongst young people. Wakefield, who had travelled from Canada where he had been researching bowel transplantation, would win awards for his work on the aetiology of Crohn's disease.
In 1992, the British government backhandedly admitted that two of the three types of MMRs they had introduced in the late 1980s had been dropped following serious adverse reactions created by the Urabe strain of mumps virus used. Thousands of children, principally in Canada, Japan and Britain, were made ill by this vaccine. However, in Japan and Canada parents of vaccine damaged children were quickly compensated. In Britain, a morally bankrupt Department of Health sided with the pharmaceutical industry to claim that the adverse reactions suffered by these children were so slight as to be of no consequences. (3)
By 1993, parents seeking help with one aspect of MMR's adverse reactions, a novel new condition of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) followed by regressive autism, began to attend the Royal Free Hospital. As these children began presenting there, Dr Wakefield contacted the DH to inform the head of vaccine and immunology Dr David Salisbury that he considered MMR could be creating a public health crisis and asked for a meeting. It took Salisbury almost six years to arrange such a meeting.
In 1992, the parents of MMR vaccine damaged children began preparing a legal claim against three pharmaceutical companies. By the end of the 1990s the number of parent claimants attached to this lawsuit had grown to around 2,500 and Dr Wakefield had been assigned by the claimants' lawyers to give expert evidence for the parents. In 1998 the Lancet published the case review paper and later that year Deer wrote the first of a series of articles character assassinating previous expert witnesses who had appeared for vaccine damaged claimants and casting doubt upon other cases of vaccine damage claimants.
In 2004 after a decade of organisation and legal finessing, , the first batch of claimants cases, were due to come before the High Court. However, in a move to support the pharmaceutical companies and deny thousands of parents their rights under civil law, legal aid was withdrawn from all the cases. Under a post-industrial New Labour government, a century of civil law enabling citizens to sue powerful interests was snatched from the people.
2004 was the fulcrum year, the year when the legitimate legal claims of citizens against three pharmaceutical companies were turned on their head and a zealous, immoral and criminal campaign was begun by the government and the pharmaceutical companies to wipe out all reports of vaccine damage and anyone who might stand as an expert on this issue. Only months after Deer's Sunday Times attack on Dr Wakefield, Dr Richard Horton whose line manager at Elsevier the Lancet's publisher was Sir Crispin Davis also a board member of GlaxoSmith Kline, published a pulp fiction paperback which lauded the absolute safety of MMR.
more here for anyone who actually has an open mind here
http://www.cryshame.co.uk//index.php?op ... Itemid=217
*********
did you know?
The overall boss for The Sunday Times, James Murdoch, CEO of News International, is also on the Board of MMR vaccine supplier and litigation defendant GlaxoSmithKline. Murdoch?s Glaxo job is expressly to oversee:-
?external issues that might have the potential for serious impact upon the group?s business and reputation?:[James Murdoch takes GlaxoSmithKline role - Chris Tryhorn The Guardian Monday 2 February 2009.
Some have now dubbed the paper "The Sunday Glaxo".
"The principal finding of the Lancet paper was made by Dr Dhillon at The Royal Free Hospital who was and is independent of Dr Wakefield [intestinal pathology (inflammation and lymph node swelling) in children with an autistic spectrum disorder [pervasive developmental disorder] and intestinal symptoms]. This was revealed in the long running General Medical Council proceedings against eminent gastroenterologists Professors Murch, Walker-Smith and Dr Wakefield. "
Papers Supporting the Original Finding
The claim to have found a new inflammatory bowel disease published in the 1998 Lancet paper as ?consistent gastrointestinal findings? involving ?nonspecific colitis? were supported first by a series of peer reviewed papers including in The Lancet itself:-
Furlano R, Anthony A, Day R, Brown A, Mc Garvey L, Thomson M, et al. ?Colonic CD8 and T cell filtration with epithelial damage in children with autism.? J Pediatr 2001;138:366-72.
Sabra S, Bellanti JA, Colon AR. ?Ileal lymphoid hyperplasia, non-specific colitis and pervasive developmental disorder in children?. The Lancet 1998;352:234-5.
Torrente F., Machado N., Perez-Machado M., Furlano R., Thomson M., Davies S., Wakefield AJ, Walker-Smith JA, Murch SH. ?Enteropathy with T cell infiltration and epithelial IgG deposition in autism.? Molecular Psychiatry. 2002;7:375-382
Wakefield AJ, Anthony A, Murch SH, Thomson M, Montgomery SM, Davies S, Walker-Smith JA. ?Enterocolitis in children with developmental disorder.? American Journal of Gastroenterology 2000;95:2285-2295
Ashwood P, Anthony A, Pellicer AA, Torrente F, Wakefield AJ. ?Intestinal lymphocyte populations in children with regressive autism: evidence for extensive mucosal immunopathology.? Journal of Clinical Immunology, 2003;23:504-517.
Papers Replicating The Original Finding
Another series of papers replicated the findings of The Royal Free Hospital London?s 1998 Lancet paper which journalist Brian Deer and The Sunday Times have falsely claimed is discredited:-
Gonzalez, L. et al., ?Endoscopic and Histological Characteristics of the Digestive Mucosa in Autistic Children with gastro-Intestinal Symptoms?. Arch Venez Pueric Pediatr, 2005;69:19-25.
Balzola, F., et al., ?Panenteric IBD-like disease in a patient with regressive autism shown for the first time by wireless capsule enteroscopy: Another piece in the jig-saw of the gut-brain syndrome?? American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2005. 100(4): p. 979- 981.
S. Walker, K. Hepner, J. Segal, A. Krigsman ?Persistent Ileal Measles Virus in a Large Cohort of Regressive Autistic Children with Ileocolitis and Lymphonodular Hyperplasia: Revisitation of an Earlier Study? (last accessed June 2007) (paper submitted for publication)
Balzola F et al . ?Autistic enterocolitis: confirmation of a new inflammatory bowel disease in an Italian cohort of patients.? Gastroenterology 2005;128(Suppl. 2);A-303.
excerpted from http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/ ... eplicated/
Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
http://homeopathycures.wordpress.com/ & http://vaccinationdangers.wordpress.com/
ONLINE/Email classes in Homeopathy; Vaccine Dangers; Childhood Diseases
Next classes start December 2 & 3 and January 6 & 7