Minutus

Absolutely.
Liz

"The zymotists suggested that certain substances called "zymes" that were inert outside the body could lie dormant until the internal terrain made it possible for them to multiply and caused specific diseases.

The observations of the zymotists are very similar to the activities of viral material in the human body. The term zymotic can be found in the old homoeopathic literature and is a rubric in the general section of Kent's Repertory.

Hahnemann synthesized the ideas of the animalcule and zymes and redefined the Hippocratic term "miasma" to express the constitutional derangements caused by parasitic infections. He carefully separated the self-limiting acute miasms from the syndromes of long lasting diseases and started to develop a special materia medica and repertory for the treatment of the chronic miasms."

David Little
If we make some attempt to look at an overview of what contemporary virology can offer, viruses are neither living nor dead, but are virtually invisible protein structures that contain RNA or DNA information. Depending on the susceptibility of the prospective host organism, without which these bits of info. can't actually DO anything, there is either an effect (illness) that is manifested in a way peculiar to that host, in varying degrees of severity, or not, and there may be a delayed reaction that requires some future trigger. This foreign DNA/RNA info. needs to communicate with the hosts innate DNA/RNA through a form of energy transfer.

Conventional medicine is too grounded in chemistry and chemical reactions to appreciate the more subtle aspects of the energy physics involved in the concept of how this energy is communicated.

Homeopathic remedies obviously contain energy that has been refined to a point that it communicates with the RNA/DNA of not only the host but the RNA/DNA of the virus/morbific agent. To some degree the medium is the message.

Another reason why vaccination is such a dangerous practise.

Laurie
________________________________

From: "finrod@finrod.co.uk"
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wed, November 24, 2010 10:25:34 AM
Subject: [Minutus] Aph 11 - Organon 6 [1 Attachment]
Just because Joy stated that it should be read again, here is Aph 11 - please read it and we will
follow the discussion.

Simply put, Hn states that when the VF becomes deranged, it produces symptoms. Yes - we would all
agree.
He then discusses the fact that Homeopathic remedies have a dynamic nature and tries to explain this
by giving examples of gravity and magnetism - that is to say the effect is not material. Yes indeed
I think we would all agree with that.

So far as I can see, there is nothing in this that opposes what I have been saying - In fact the
very opposite.

Please note this from the foot note:
" And thus every special medicinal substance alters through a kind of infection, that well-being of
man in a peculiar manner exclusively its own and not in a manner peculiar to another medicine, as
certainly as the nearness of the child ill with small-pox will communicate to a healthy child only
small-pox and not measles. "

From the " as certainly as the nearness of the child ill with small-pox will communicate to a
healthy child only small-pox and not measles. " I recognised that there were certain influences that
made sure that if you brought a child near to a child with measles they would get measles. The fact
that they got measles and not smallpox means that these influences are uniquely caused by different
agencies. It is only through painstaking research that the micro organism for each of these has
been identified. (Remember the smallpox laden blankets given to the native Americans.)

Remember also the fact that the cholera epidemic of 1854 was caused by a cholera contaminated water.
Once that source was stopped, the infections stopped. So the people who were unlucky to be given
smallpox laden blankets did NOT develop cholera or measles - they developed SMALLPOX.

Best Regards
Soroush
§ 11 Sixth Edition
When a person falls ill, it is only this spiritual, self acting (automatic) vital force, everywhere
present in his organism, that is primarily deranged by the dynamic 6 influence upon it of a morbific
agent inimical to life; it is only the vital force, deranged to such an abnormal state, that can
furnish the organism with its disagreeable sensations, and incline it to the irregular processes
which we call disease; for, as a power invisible in itself, and only cognizable by its effects on
the organism, its morbid derangement only makes itself known by the manifestation of disease in the
sensations and functions of those parts of the organism exposed to the senses of the observer and
physician, that is, by morbid symptoms, and in no other way can it make itself known. 7
6 Materia peccans!
7 What is dynamic influence, - dynamic power? Our earth, by virtue of a hidden invisible energy,
carries the moon around her in twenty-eight days and several hours, and the moon alternately, in
definite fixed hours (deducting certain differences which occur with the full and new moon) raises
our northern seas to flood tide and again correspondingly lowers them to ebb. Apparently this takes
place not through material agencies, not through mechanical contrivances, as are used for products
of human labor; and so we see numerous other events about us as results of the action of one
substance on another substance without being able to recognize a sensible connection between cause
and effect. Only the cultured, practised in comparison and deduction, can form for himself a kind of
supra-sensual idea sufficient to keep all that is material or mechanical in his thoughts from such
concepts. He calls such effects dynamic, virtual, that is, such as result from absolute, specific,
pure energy and action of he one substance upon the other substance.
For instance, the dynamic effect of the sick-making influences upon healthy man, as well as the
dynamic energy of the medicines upon the principle of life in the restoration of health is nothing
else than infection and so not in any way material, not in any way mechanical. Just as the energy of
a magnet attracting a piece of iron or steel is not material, not mechanical. One sees that the
piece of iron is attracted by one pole of the magnet, but how it is done is not seen. This invisible
energy of the magnet does not require mechanical (material) auxiliary means, hook or lever, to
attract the iron. The magnet draws to itself and this acts upon the piece of iron or upon a steel
needle by means of a purely immaterial invisible, conceptual, inherent energy, that is, dynamically,
and communicates to the steel needle the magnetic energy equally invisibly (dynamically). The steel
needle becomes itself magnetic, even at a distance when the magnet does not touch it, and magnetises
other steel needles with the same magnetic property (dynamically) with which it had been endowered
previously by the magnetic rod, just as a child with small-pox or measles communicates to a near,
untouched healthy child in an invisible manner (dynamically) the small-pox or measles, that is,
infects it at a distance without anything material from the infective child going or capable of
going to the one to be infected. A purely specific conceptual influence communicated to the near
child small-pox or measles in the same way as the magnet communicated to the near needle the
magnetic property.
In a similar way, the effect of medicines upon living man is to be judged. Substances, which are
used as medicines, are medicines only in so far as they possess each its own specific energy to
alter the well-being of man through dynamic, conceptual influence, by means of the living sensory
fibre, upon the conceptual controlling principle of life. The medicinal property of those material
substances which we call medicines proper, relates only to their energy to call out alterations in
the well-being of animal life. Only upon this conceptual principle of life, depends their medicinal
health-altering, conceptual (dynamic) influence. Just as the nearness of a magnetic pole can
communicate only magnetic energy to the steel (namely, by a kind of infection) but cannot
communicate other properties (for instance, more hardness or ductility, etc.). And thus every
special medicinal substance alters through a kind of infection, that well-being of man in a peculiar
manner exclusively its own and not in a manner peculiar to another medicine, as certainly as the
nearness of the child ill with small-pox will communicate to a healthy child only small-pox and not
measles. These medicines act upon our well-being wholly without communication of material parts of
the medicinal substances, thus dynamically, as if through infection. Far more healing energy is
expressed in a case in point by the smallest dose of the best dynamized medicines, in which there
can be, according to calculation, only so little of material substance that its minuteness cannot be
thought and conceived by the best arithmetical mind, than by large doses of the same medicine in
substance. That smallest dose can therefore contain almost entirely only the pure, freely-developed,
conceptual medicinal energy, and bring about only dynamically such great effects as can never be
reached by the crude medicinal substances itself taken in large doses.
It is not in the corporal atoms of these highly dynamized medicines, nor their physical or
mathematical surfaces (with which the higher energies of the dynamized medicines are being
interpreted but vainly as still sufficiently material) that the medicinal energy is found. More
likely, there lies invisible in the moistened globule or in its solution, an unveiled, liberated,
specific, medicinal force contained in the medicinal substance which acts dynamically by contact
with the living animal fibre upon the whole organism (without communicating to it anything material
however highly attenuated) and acts more strongly the more free and more immaterial the energy has
become through the dynamization.
Is it then so utterly impossible for our age celebrated for its wealth in clear thinkers to think of
dynamic energy as something non-corporeal, since we see daily phenomena which cannot be explained in
any other manner? If one looks upon something nauseous and becomes inclined to vomit, did a material
emetic come into his stomach which compels him to this anti-peristaltic movement? Was it not solely
the dynamic effect of the nauseating aspect upon his imagination? And if one raises his arm, does it
occur through a material visible instrument? a lever? Is it not solely the conceptual dynamic energy
of his will which raises it?