Fell off a bridge
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:24 pm
Hello all,
I have just taken a 10 meter fall from a bridge. Landing hard on the soil below. Many blunt force injuries and broken bones. My questions are:
Should I triturate, dilute and succuss the bridge, the ground/soil or the parts of my own body that are injured? Or better yet as part of another thread how about the dark energy of my mind? Or a combination of all of them and injected like a vaccine? And then we could take the obvious derangement that would occur and perhaps make an isopathic solution from my blood or brain matter and give me that as well.
For Isopathy to work, would it not have to work under all circumstances instead of a very few? How does one know that one MMR shot is the same as the next? (They are not) And what of the plethora of cases of vaccinosis that have been treated to cure without resorting to giving an unproven rx? I am not saying that I ignore or refute another practitioners findings on the matter or that I wouldn't try as a last resort something like this new isopathy. This also does not make any reference to the number of cases in which it has not worked at all. (Too many to count)
This reminds me of the, as of now anecdotal findings, regarding the sensation method. We have one or two practitioners in the whole of the Homeopathic community saying that it is the perfect approach and beyond refute. Within the context of the new isopathy we have the same thing. It is in it's earliest stages of being proved out. It falls in with homeoprophylaxis. Which I am also very skeptical of since it is in it's infancy and almost unprovable. Again that is not to say that results (positive/negative) should be ignored. But we should also question it, in that it is the giving of an unproven rx (unethical?) and there is no way to determine that it matches the patients symptom set. This model leads to only one thing: therapeutic this for that prescribing.
I ask any of you that use triturated unproven vaccine based remedies, if you tell the patient that you are now engaging in an unproven, anecdotal form of isopathy and if you differentiate it from Homeopathy?
What about cases of autism or anything else when the patient has not been vaccinated?
These are important discussions that need to be had. Although on occasion uncomfortable this is our virtual peer review.
It should also be noted that Smits would be the first to admit that dietary changes made in cases of autism were many times paving the way to cure.
Best regards, Rik
Ho
I have just taken a 10 meter fall from a bridge. Landing hard on the soil below. Many blunt force injuries and broken bones. My questions are:
Should I triturate, dilute and succuss the bridge, the ground/soil or the parts of my own body that are injured? Or better yet as part of another thread how about the dark energy of my mind? Or a combination of all of them and injected like a vaccine? And then we could take the obvious derangement that would occur and perhaps make an isopathic solution from my blood or brain matter and give me that as well.
For Isopathy to work, would it not have to work under all circumstances instead of a very few? How does one know that one MMR shot is the same as the next? (They are not) And what of the plethora of cases of vaccinosis that have been treated to cure without resorting to giving an unproven rx? I am not saying that I ignore or refute another practitioners findings on the matter or that I wouldn't try as a last resort something like this new isopathy. This also does not make any reference to the number of cases in which it has not worked at all. (Too many to count)
This reminds me of the, as of now anecdotal findings, regarding the sensation method. We have one or two practitioners in the whole of the Homeopathic community saying that it is the perfect approach and beyond refute. Within the context of the new isopathy we have the same thing. It is in it's earliest stages of being proved out. It falls in with homeoprophylaxis. Which I am also very skeptical of since it is in it's infancy and almost unprovable. Again that is not to say that results (positive/negative) should be ignored. But we should also question it, in that it is the giving of an unproven rx (unethical?) and there is no way to determine that it matches the patients symptom set. This model leads to only one thing: therapeutic this for that prescribing.
I ask any of you that use triturated unproven vaccine based remedies, if you tell the patient that you are now engaging in an unproven, anecdotal form of isopathy and if you differentiate it from Homeopathy?
What about cases of autism or anything else when the patient has not been vaccinated?
These are important discussions that need to be had. Although on occasion uncomfortable this is our virtual peer review.
It should also be noted that Smits would be the first to admit that dietary changes made in cases of autism were many times paving the way to cure.
Best regards, Rik
Ho