Acceptance of something wrong that I did earlier
Posted: Mon Sep 13, 2010 11:07 am
I would like to say here that when someone explained me in a proper way about Newton’s Third Law of Motion, then I realized that I’ve actually been wrong in the way I’ve understood about the Newton’s Third Law of Motion. But it does not mean that the reaction force where it had to produced will not be produced. It’s really a thing to be noticed that despite I wrote Newton’s Third Law of Motion in the wrong way almost everybody who read it took my version as the right version and even now if someone will read it then I’m very much sure that it would be very difficult to understand that where I’ve been wrong in this as even your mind will agree to how have I explained it. Though there were also others who said me wrong on this but never explained it. Reaction forces are very tricky vectors and now when I’ve understood it, I really feel bad that I understood Newton’s Third Law of Motion in wrong way.
But I would like to say here that please do not extrapolate it the level that I would have been wrong in my book too, as reaction forces will be the same where it had to be produced, whether in the way I’ve understood it or whether we take it by the correct version of Newton’s Third Law of Motion. So that would not bear any wrong on my theory or on my book as it’s just that I’ve taken into account reaction forces wherein they had to be produced and thus have used it in the force analysis. So it does not bear any wrong on my theory.
My book is already been loved, as we can see in the feedback and discussions on forums too.
I know accepting about this fact that I’ve been wrong in understanding Newton’s Third Law of Motion may make many to feel that I may also been wrong in my book, but even then I have humbly accepted about my anomaly in Newton’s Third Law of Motion, when I’ve now understood it than unduly say that I’m right in this.
More so my understanding of correct version of Newton’s Third Law now, will only pave the way for others too to think about it as I know many have taken my version of Newton’s Third Law right. Also the wrong version of Newton’s Third Law above in my blog will stand a testimony to the fact that how me and then others too believed on it earlier. So I’ve no intentions to delete it from my blog now.
Varun
http://eyevarun.blogspot.com
http://eyevarun.spaces.live.com
http://facebook.com/eyevarun
http://twitter.com/eyevarun
http://eyevarun.wordpress.com
But I would like to say here that please do not extrapolate it the level that I would have been wrong in my book too, as reaction forces will be the same where it had to be produced, whether in the way I’ve understood it or whether we take it by the correct version of Newton’s Third Law of Motion. So that would not bear any wrong on my theory or on my book as it’s just that I’ve taken into account reaction forces wherein they had to be produced and thus have used it in the force analysis. So it does not bear any wrong on my theory.
My book is already been loved, as we can see in the feedback and discussions on forums too.
I know accepting about this fact that I’ve been wrong in understanding Newton’s Third Law of Motion may make many to feel that I may also been wrong in my book, but even then I have humbly accepted about my anomaly in Newton’s Third Law of Motion, when I’ve now understood it than unduly say that I’m right in this.
More so my understanding of correct version of Newton’s Third Law now, will only pave the way for others too to think about it as I know many have taken my version of Newton’s Third Law right. Also the wrong version of Newton’s Third Law above in my blog will stand a testimony to the fact that how me and then others too believed on it earlier. So I’ve no intentions to delete it from my blog now.
Varun
http://eyevarun.blogspot.com
http://eyevarun.spaces.live.com
http://facebook.com/eyevarun
http://twitter.com/eyevarun
http://eyevarun.wordpress.com