Page 1 of 1

Old/New tool for homeopaths - P&W 2011 ed. Boenninghausen's Therapeutic Pocket Book

Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2010 7:25 am
by Vera Resnick
Polony & Weaver of OpenRep are releasing a new computerized repertory within a few weeks: The P&W 2011 Edition of Boenninghausen's Therapeutic Pocket Book. For more information about the repertory, explanations etc. go to www.boenrep.com

They are running a competition on Homeopathy World Community and offering a free complete repertory as the prize. The link for the competition is here: http://www.homeopathyworldcommunity.com ... edition-of

I've seen this repertory in action - for those interested in Boenninghausen's methods it really makes the work smoother and more reliable, and the interface is extremely user-friendly.

Vera
------------------------------------
Vera Resnick
Classical Homeopath
054-4640736
e-mail: vera.homeopath@gmail.com
www.jerusalemhomeopath.com
www.materiamedicastudymethods.wordpress.com

Re: Old/New tool for homeopaths - P&W 2011 ed. Boenninghausen's Therapeutic Pocket Book

Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2010 12:34 pm
by Venkat
I do not know whether P & W are members here. Here is a question.

I have seen from the days of Julian that there is a tendency to castigate the Robert's edition. Is it because that is available at less than 4 dollars from B Jain ?

Can anyone of the knowledgeable tell me whether the new Dimitriadis edition or P & W edition is indeed accurately different from Roberts' edition ?

Also, I am yet to hear criticism of Boger's rep. To my knowledge, Boger knew German and possibly was in possession of original copies of Boenninghaussen's TPB. But he made an improvement in the basic structure by adding local time, local agg, local amel and local concomittants to the already existing general modalities, time and concomittants.

Also Boger added new remedies to TPB.

P& W mentions thousands of hours of exacting works in compiling his rep. Is it all justified when seeing extant works such as Boger's etc ?

Venkat
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Sheri Nakken wrote: