Minutus

The reality here is the toxins that have been found in whale blubber and meat to a large extent. I think that a better remedy can be found. One that does not introduce the body with unnecessary added toxins... Blessings, Meo

I don't think the issue introducing toxins to the human body. If the toxins are part of the proving,
then we will be getting sx of the toxins in the proving. So there is a reality that we should be doing
provings of the toxins, themselves.
That seems quite relevant today with the high level of toxicity on the human body. Studies have
stated that we have over 300 toxins in our system. Babies are known to be born with over 150 toxins
in their bodies.
Why not see what the potentized toxins give us in provings. We already have remedies from some
drugs and carbon compounds.
tanya

Provings of the toxins themselves would pretty certainly give different results -- and be useful for different cases and purposes -- than proving of animal-affected-by-toxins. E.g. difference between nux vomica (which contains much strychnine) and provings of strychnine: one cannot substitute for the other, if I understand correctly.

that is my point. i never implied one was a substitute for the other--just dealing with different realities and possibilities
tanya