[H] Potency choice
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2002 7:45 pm
John wrote:
we?
I compared the 'shape' with 'frequency' The remedy specifics are also a part
of this shape.
A signalshape can be build up with a fundumental wave and harmonics and
non-harmonic frequencies.
Important in this example is to make clear there is a 'shape' and a
'amplitude' of the remedy information.
I wrote:
in
John:
It is not that hard to understand: LM more 'broad' dynamic development and C
'high'
(= specific) dynamic development.
Yes, 'cloud' (non specific) cases need low potencies (broad) but on the
other hand highly dynamic developed, so LM's are here more indicated.
But in more clear 'specific' cases a high C potency is more indicated.
John:
rules
Yes I agree to the first statement, but
Of coarse there are rules!
Kind regards, Piet
we?
I compared the 'shape' with 'frequency' The remedy specifics are also a part
of this shape.
A signalshape can be build up with a fundumental wave and harmonics and
non-harmonic frequencies.
Important in this example is to make clear there is a 'shape' and a
'amplitude' of the remedy information.
I wrote:
in
John:
It is not that hard to understand: LM more 'broad' dynamic development and C
'high'
(= specific) dynamic development.
Yes, 'cloud' (non specific) cases need low potencies (broad) but on the
other hand highly dynamic developed, so LM's are here more indicated.
But in more clear 'specific' cases a high C potency is more indicated.
John:
rules
Yes I agree to the first statement, but
Of coarse there are rules!
Kind regards, Piet