The issues listed 2 messages below can happen with any method. I believe Teresa's question was, assuming those major practice principles *were* in order, how that relates to Carol's question. Carol, I think if there are remedies in-between and/or a certain stretch of time has lapsed, that H would not deem it a problem...I think he meant in reasonably close proximity. I also feel he would not condemn the use of same potency forever, no matter the circumstances. My own cure was one of them, and countless others by homeopaths for over 200 years. This must be given credit, whether a newer method is better or not. It's the prescriber at the helm that matters most, following their intuition as much with dosing as with selection. I've experienced dosing and profound healing without the remedy even given directly (no, not by one of those machines)...which of course was properly selected. That 'dosing' is not in any edition I'm aware of. Hahnemann ran out of time to do everything that homeopathy within his principles could reach, or to perhaps come back around to integrate the best of all his work. I don't mean combos and all that, but along his principles still. Point is, we must be careful not to create dogma.
It would be nice to see more positive productivity and less negative assumptions, bordering sarcasm. At least it really comes across that way. It's wonderful to offer guidance, share wisdom and experiences, others will learn. Create new schools if there is a need for more education, share informational pieces. It is not productive or helpful teaching to attack or discredit others when one is not truly in the position to judge.
There is certainly validity in the fact there is poor prescribing out there, well-known, but what goes on here is often aimed at those not deserving, at least not to that degree, or general blanket statements are made about other homeopaths. There are some good points, but others go too far. Take that energy/focus and put it toward progress for us all. We don't need homeopath police on the list, but sharing & teaching with love, respect & kindness. So much more welcome.
I'll probably get it myself for saying all this- but can't help it, I'm on a remedy that's about healing fundamental separation, which includes my homeopathic community. Bashing only drives it apart. For 10 years I've worked at building community, educating and changing legal issues to practice. We're already too separate, therefore weak, and don't need *anything* to feed it. Let's work toward oneness in ourselves and how homeopathy can become whole.
Thank you Jennifer for the nice poem.
Liz
In
minutus@yahoogroups.com, Shannon & Bob Nelson shannonnelson@...wrote:
As of when I was in school, approx 12 years ago, there were *many*
homeopaths treating that way--Eizayaga's camp I think were part,
possibly Vega Rozenberg may have also been teaching that, and I don't know who else--but there were quite a few in my classes who had been trained or treated that way. Some of them I found to be very well able to differentiate cure vs. suppression vs. palliation.
At 07:07 AM 12/5/2009, you wrote:
Teresa's question:
And how does all this rhyme with the fact that at least one well-known American prescriber uses 12c dry, daily over a month or so with (apparently) excellent results? Teresa (lay person, Northern VA)
From:
minutus@yahoogroups.com [ mailto:
minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Carol Orr
Sent: Saturday, December 05, 2009 5:26 AM
To:
minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Minutus] that the same potency shouldn't be given twice in a row
I'm wondering if taking same potency dry twice... if there is a