Minutus

Dear All,

as to the question "is (Dr S's rx's) made radionically". I don't know.

What I do know is that Abha Light was donated a vial of the remedy "iquilai" in low potency and was instructed to potentize it up to 30 ourselves. So I can assure that -in kenya at least- "Iquilai" is hand succussed from low potency to 30c.

While you are all debating the legitimacy & philosophy of radionics and provings, please consider this too:

Let us say you have a remedy that can cure / treat a life threatening epidemic disease that is killing millions. You can do it cheaply, effectively. You are applying the medicine according to homeopathic epidemic principles. It has been also conventionally evidence-base researched to work beautifully, homeopathically (ie cure follows herings) and wonderfully without side effects.

Ahh, but no, it wasn't discovered or made in the strictest homeopathic manner as per a book written long before the discovery and invention of vibrational medicines.

So do we "throw out the baby with the bathwater"?

"Homeopathy" includes a number of aspects of healing: the philosophy of cure, the preparation of medicines, proving, the application of medicines, etc. You can even treat homeopathically with a few grains of substance - as some old masters did- with neither proving nor further preparation. It comes homeopatic as it's applied "minimum dose". Is it not homeopathy?

In fact, I always neutralize allopathic medicine with hoemopathic tautopathy. No proving except the apparent side effects of the patient. Is this not homeopathy still?

We are already using nano-dosing vibrational medicine. Vital Force is vibrational, the medicines are vibrational (after all, Hahnemann decreed that the medicines have to meet the vibration of the vital force) What of it if modern technology has caught up with the alchemists, can we not still use it? Is it less homeopathic?

Bach discovered his flower essences through intuitive and meditative processes. Are you throwing them out too?

In fact Neuton & Einstein and that physicist who discovered the periodic chart, made their earth-shaking discoveries thru intuition not "science". Do we throw all that out as well?

While I'm not denying that getting a full-on proving of our 3000+ materia medica is a invaluable goal for our research institutes (how many of those are there???) , do we have to dump on it in the meantime?
Sincerely,
Didi Ananda Ruchira
Director
Cells: 0733-895466 / 0723-869133
www.abhalight.org
Skype: anandarucira

Friend me!
Facebook http://www.facebook.com/anandaruchira
Twitter http://twitter.com/AbhaLight
Ning http://homeopathyworldcommunity.ning.co ... ndaRuchira

Hello Didi,

There are many therapies that have positive results in the process of
healing.
Nobody is refuting that.
But not all therapies can be labeled Homeopathic unless they fit the
parameters of Homeopathy.
If I use say Bach remedies or Drainage remedies etc, I explain to the
patient that they are not Homeopathic remedies, and that I use them in
conjunction with Homeopathy, to hasten healing process.

I would not use remedies made Radionically, until they can be proven and
it can be shown that they have staying power. I prefer to support the
Homeopathic Pharmacies that strictly follow Homeopathic tenets.

Lynn.
----------------------

While you are all debating the legitimacy & philosophy of radionics and
provings, please consider this too:

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Lynn Cremona wrote:

Hi Lynn,

You're mention of Bach Remedies brings to mind a case Will Taylor talked about.
He needed a homeopathic remedy that was not in the clinic pharmacy and was able to successfully substitute a BFR form of the needed remedy.

Leilanae
and that I use them in