Reasons, not gospel
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2009 7:18 pm
Dear Soroush,
Your repeated assertions are still coming without justification in reasoning. It's the reasoning that I've been seeking from you, and the relevance to Hahnemann's work. As well, the many reasons I've given for understanding Hahnemann to mean what he says in plain language remain totally unrebutted.
Perhaps if you focused on reasons to help us draw your conclusions, you would feel less compulsion to repeat the conclusions as though they were gospel.
Kind regards,
John
2009/7/28 >
Your repeated assertions are still coming without justification in reasoning. It's the reasoning that I've been seeking from you, and the relevance to Hahnemann's work. As well, the many reasons I've given for understanding Hahnemann to mean what he says in plain language remain totally unrebutted.
Perhaps if you focused on reasons to help us draw your conclusions, you would feel less compulsion to repeat the conclusions as though they were gospel.
Kind regards,
John
2009/7/28 >