Scientific - ( Past Lives ??)
Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2002 1:32 am
Dear Tanya,
I'm sorry but I have to disagree with your position that Homeopathy is not "scientific". Homeopathy can be proven and it has been proven in many different ways. It is only a myth that Homeopathy "cannot be proven scientifically". Rather it is merely a position of the Allopathic world that Homeopathy cannot be proved.
Objectively considered, what type of science could not accept the causation of specific range of new symptoms in a group of healthy people or the absence of symptoms in a group of sick people with similiar diseases? When "science" refuses to accept it, they only display their own ignorance of natural laws and principles, for many (well educated) people have investigated and accepted Homeopathy as a science. Therefore, the judgement that Homeopathy is not scientific, while perhaps commonly held, is not a true statement is merely a opinion.
Besides, quite truthfully, we don't know why Homeopathy works. But because it is in keeping with natural law, it is consistant and reliable. Just as while we cannot truly understand the universe, we have re-discovered the natural laws and so we can calculate, rely, and predict many things accurately based on natural laws.
Additionally, the explaination of homeopathy equaling "electromagnetic energy -- which never gets destroyed, it only transmutes" is not true. The body counteracts the action of the remedy. We can also antidote remedies, so the energy is not transmuted and it is not indestructable. Nothing in the living world is indestructible.
It is fine to believe in past lives and reincarnation if you wish, but why incorporate it with Homeopathy? And, why attack homeopathy? Does homeopathy not already have enough foes? I have my opinions on past life experiences and reincarnation but I have only shared them off list, I have no interest in promoting this topic on a Homeopathy list.
Sincerely,
Natasha
Homeopathic Student
I'm sorry but I have to disagree with your position that Homeopathy is not "scientific". Homeopathy can be proven and it has been proven in many different ways. It is only a myth that Homeopathy "cannot be proven scientifically". Rather it is merely a position of the Allopathic world that Homeopathy cannot be proved.
Objectively considered, what type of science could not accept the causation of specific range of new symptoms in a group of healthy people or the absence of symptoms in a group of sick people with similiar diseases? When "science" refuses to accept it, they only display their own ignorance of natural laws and principles, for many (well educated) people have investigated and accepted Homeopathy as a science. Therefore, the judgement that Homeopathy is not scientific, while perhaps commonly held, is not a true statement is merely a opinion.
Besides, quite truthfully, we don't know why Homeopathy works. But because it is in keeping with natural law, it is consistant and reliable. Just as while we cannot truly understand the universe, we have re-discovered the natural laws and so we can calculate, rely, and predict many things accurately based on natural laws.
Additionally, the explaination of homeopathy equaling "electromagnetic energy -- which never gets destroyed, it only transmutes" is not true. The body counteracts the action of the remedy. We can also antidote remedies, so the energy is not transmuted and it is not indestructable. Nothing in the living world is indestructible.
It is fine to believe in past lives and reincarnation if you wish, but why incorporate it with Homeopathy? And, why attack homeopathy? Does homeopathy not already have enough foes? I have my opinions on past life experiences and reincarnation but I have only shared them off list, I have no interest in promoting this topic on a Homeopathy list.
Sincerely,
Natasha
Homeopathic Student