Unproven remedies was definition [was: New media attacks on homeopathy...
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 7:06 pm
On Jul 6, 2009, at 11:21 AM, John Harvey wrote:
True, it's an important distinction.
By your first definition ("a practice within homeopathy"), I am 100% in
favor, consider it a really important touchstone, and wish that it were
the basis of *all* education in anything called "homeopathy"--even if
the practice in the end is different.
By your second definition ("an attitude of refusal to deviate from
practicing [Hahnemannian] homeopathy at all"), I did think that was
what I'd been hearing. Sorry if I'm mistaken!
In referring to what I *thought* is or was Sheilagh's approach, both
definitions would suit--my *understanding*, and I admit the possibility
that I may have been mistaken! That's why I asked.
Shannon
True, it's an important distinction.
By your first definition ("a practice within homeopathy"), I am 100% in
favor, consider it a really important touchstone, and wish that it were
the basis of *all* education in anything called "homeopathy"--even if
the practice in the end is different.
By your second definition ("an attitude of refusal to deviate from
practicing [Hahnemannian] homeopathy at all"), I did think that was
what I'd been hearing. Sorry if I'm mistaken!
In referring to what I *thought* is or was Sheilagh's approach, both
definitions would suit--my *understanding*, and I admit the possibility
that I may have been mistaken! That's why I asked.
Shannon