prophylaxis was definition [was: New media attacks on homeopathy...
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 5:52 pm
Hi again, Shannon --
If the remedy has been prescribed on some basis other than symptom similarity, then of course it is not homoeopathy, as you say; but an analogy more apt than the refusal to call nuclear physics "physics" would be to refuse to call physics "chemistry" though both belong in the physical sciences. Just as physics did not grow out of chemistry and is not an application of chemistry, any method that does not apply the law of similars is not an application of homoeopathy.
Simple, really, isn't it.
As for Luise's question, I'm agnostic; I have no knowledge of the situation it refers to.
Cheers!
John
2009/7/6 Shannon & Bob Nelson >
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
"Nothing is so fatal to the progress of the human mind as to suppose that our views of science are ultimate; that there are no mysteries in nature; that our triumphs are complete; and that there are no new worlds to conquer."
— Sir Humphry Davy, in "An Account of some Galvanic Combinations", Philosophical Transactions 91 (1801), pp. 397–402 (as quoted by David Knight, Humphry Davy: Science and Power, Cambridge, 1998, p. 87)
If the remedy has been prescribed on some basis other than symptom similarity, then of course it is not homoeopathy, as you say; but an analogy more apt than the refusal to call nuclear physics "physics" would be to refuse to call physics "chemistry" though both belong in the physical sciences. Just as physics did not grow out of chemistry and is not an application of chemistry, any method that does not apply the law of similars is not an application of homoeopathy.
Simple, really, isn't it.
As for Luise's question, I'm agnostic; I have no knowledge of the situation it refers to.
Cheers!
John
2009/7/6 Shannon & Bob Nelson >
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
"Nothing is so fatal to the progress of the human mind as to suppose that our views of science are ultimate; that there are no mysteries in nature; that our triumphs are complete; and that there are no new worlds to conquer."
— Sir Humphry Davy, in "An Account of some Galvanic Combinations", Philosophical Transactions 91 (1801), pp. 397–402 (as quoted by David Knight, Humphry Davy: Science and Power, Cambridge, 1998, p. 87)