Repressive effect of bullying
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:02 pm
Irene, have you noticed what has occurred in the past several hours on discussion of a vital topic -- the nature of this "homoeopathy" we wish to unite to save? It's basically ceased, thanks to the repressive effect of your bullying.
Its acme in your clueless threats is just the tip of the iceberg, unfortunately. You treat any discussion or question as an invitation to advertise yourself, you treat the most inane presumptions as givens, you criticise those who actually understand homoeopathy's meaning and use the word that way, and you have the utter gall to repeatedly accuse anybody who disagrees with you of criticising you.
Personally, I think it's time you were thrown off the list for irrelevance, inaccuracy, and impertinence, and I can't think why Soroush and whoever else moderates here didn't do it years ago. How have other lists put up with you -- or have they? Would the assumption that you're welcome on any other list be as accurate as the assumption that there was anything to the story of the burglary and vandalism of your home?
I reckon you should at least go and stick your head in a bucket of water to freshen up. Your attitude is old, and your will to become the new Hahnemann, only more better, is stifling and repugnant. You could do so much good on this list if you could just get over yourself. So how about it?
Ciao, and goodnight, folks --
John
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
"Nothing is so fatal to the progress of the human mind as to suppose that our views of science are ultimate; that there are no mysteries in nature; that our triumphs are complete; and that there are no new worlds to conquer."
— Sir Humphry Davy, in "An Account of some Galvanic Combinations", Philosophical Transactions 91 (1801), pp. 397–402 (as quoted by David Knight, Humphry Davy: Science and Power, Cambridge, 1998, p. 87)
Its acme in your clueless threats is just the tip of the iceberg, unfortunately. You treat any discussion or question as an invitation to advertise yourself, you treat the most inane presumptions as givens, you criticise those who actually understand homoeopathy's meaning and use the word that way, and you have the utter gall to repeatedly accuse anybody who disagrees with you of criticising you.
Personally, I think it's time you were thrown off the list for irrelevance, inaccuracy, and impertinence, and I can't think why Soroush and whoever else moderates here didn't do it years ago. How have other lists put up with you -- or have they? Would the assumption that you're welcome on any other list be as accurate as the assumption that there was anything to the story of the burglary and vandalism of your home?
I reckon you should at least go and stick your head in a bucket of water to freshen up. Your attitude is old, and your will to become the new Hahnemann, only more better, is stifling and repugnant. You could do so much good on this list if you could just get over yourself. So how about it?
Ciao, and goodnight, folks --
John
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
"Nothing is so fatal to the progress of the human mind as to suppose that our views of science are ultimate; that there are no mysteries in nature; that our triumphs are complete; and that there are no new worlds to conquer."
— Sir Humphry Davy, in "An Account of some Galvanic Combinations", Philosophical Transactions 91 (1801), pp. 397–402 (as quoted by David Knight, Humphry Davy: Science and Power, Cambridge, 1998, p. 87)