Minutus

John, you are so far into ultra-cleverness, cutesieness and
"i'm-so-much-cooler-than-you-ism", that it's just taking way too much
work to figure out what you're talking about, and then how to tease
apart the cutsieisms in a way that allows rational and factual
response.

Again--how about re-writing that, in a way that states--simply and
cleanly--what you believe the be the problems, and what you believe to
be the facts.

E.g., you wrote: "I love that this so-called expert doesn't
acknowledge any aspect of the principle of homoeopathy: neither the
requirement for a knowledge of a drug's primary effects [[ which "drug"
are you asserting is being used without any knowledge of its primary
effects?]] nor a taking of the individual case [[ which instances are
you referring to, in which cases are not being taken? ]]..."

Shannon

Hi John,

While I will not write any more on the subject itself, it does
interest me in which way I have hit with ma post - I re-read in order
find out, but failed to do so - anything having to do with duplicity
or multiplicity.

Perhaps you can enlighten me to what I wrote - it seems I am not able
to read my own posts:-o

Regards

Luise
--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========

Just to set the record straight, the topic on which I posted and
which John took off in imaginary directions that are NOT my
directions - is this one from my post of 23 june and no other:
........................................................................
.............................
I propose this definition:

The Practice of Homeopathy is the "art of healing" and of developing
resistance to further illness, by the use of the PRINCIPLES developed
and practiced by Samuel Hahnemann, and documented in his Organon of
Medicine and other writings.

End definition.
........................................................................
.............................
There is nothing there about multiplicity or duplicity, John.
Since I sent the post quoted above on a suggested homeopathy
definition and until now - John's posts have not been about
homeopathy as used by anyone (despite his claims to the contrary)
so it is no wonder it is unclear what HOMEOPATHY topic he is
referring to.
(People are not topics.)
Perhaps now Soroush has spoken, that will change. If possible,
still would like to revert to discussion of the proposed definition.
(Here or elsewhere)

Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."

No quote - so no response.

Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."