Cat bite first aid - was The campaign against spring fever, and a better alternative
Posted: Wed Jul 01, 2009 12:37 am
Actually, I think that Luise may have hit upon the basis of a communication problem here: multiplicity. This is something like duplicity but multiplied. (The technical definition is duplicity of duplicity.) With this problem, one makes all kinds of mutually contradictory assertions, denies having made each one, and denies any and all contradictions amongst them. Apparently it also affects one's "homoeopathic" practice, though, causing one to believe that two remedies are one, then that three remedies are one, and, in the very serious stage which nobody has yet cured, that four remedies are one.
If there's a cure for the last stage, no stick-in-the-mud homoeopath has yet been able to find it. Perhaps Irene could have a go at it.
I love that this so-called expert doesn't acknowledge any aspect of the principle of homoeopathy: neither the requirement for a knowledge of a drug's primary effects nor a taking of the individual case nor the selection of a single substance on the basis of its ability to mimic the individual case. It clearly demonstrates expertise beyond the sublime!
John
2009/7/1 Luise Kunkle >
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
"Nothing is so fatal to the progress of the human mind as to suppose that our views of science are ultimate; that there are no mysteries in nature; that our triumphs are complete; and that there are no new worlds to conquer."
— Sir Humphry Davy, in "An Account of some Galvanic Combinations", Philosophical Transactions 91 (1801), pp. 397–402 (as quoted by David Knight, Humphry Davy: Science and Power, Cambridge, 1998, p. 87)
If there's a cure for the last stage, no stick-in-the-mud homoeopath has yet been able to find it. Perhaps Irene could have a go at it.
I love that this so-called expert doesn't acknowledge any aspect of the principle of homoeopathy: neither the requirement for a knowledge of a drug's primary effects nor a taking of the individual case nor the selection of a single substance on the basis of its ability to mimic the individual case. It clearly demonstrates expertise beyond the sublime!
John
2009/7/1 Luise Kunkle >
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
"Nothing is so fatal to the progress of the human mind as to suppose that our views of science are ultimate; that there are no mysteries in nature; that our triumphs are complete; and that there are no new worlds to conquer."
— Sir Humphry Davy, in "An Account of some Galvanic Combinations", Philosophical Transactions 91 (1801), pp. 397–402 (as quoted by David Knight, Humphry Davy: Science and Power, Cambridge, 1998, p. 87)
