Asked what? Whether I hadn't seen a one-dose case? I did answer that.
(See below.)
What else do you want me to explain?
Here's the rest of my reply to the rest of your questions. I don't
expect it to help, tho...
I don't understand the question, but will try to come back to it.
Sorry, I don't remember any more what those questions were! Ask again
if *you* remember; if not, we'll let it go.
Yep, and I said nothing that would imply I was doing that, or
advocating it.
What? Isn't "temporary" the *definition* of an acute? Dog bite; acute
ailment; individual allergy attack...
That is my point. When you realize you're dealing with a miasmatic
issue, you realize you will have more to deal with than the simple
presenting complaint.
And I never suggested any such thing. You're just looking for excuses
to assume the worst! And you're doing a very good job of it.
How about *either* sticking to what I have SAID, or just use that as a
jumping-off point for sharing your own thoughts *about the topic*.
*That* would be useful; challenging me about things I never said and
would not say, well, it's boring and not useful to anyone.
Mhm.
How could one possibly try to "set aside" migraines? However--
In some circumstances I don't know how you could cure the migraines
*without* that sort of information. If so, great (depends on the
case); if not, then you have to get the information. You could begin
by looking for an "acute" remedy to be used for an individual attack,
but that will not (in most cases) stop the attacks from recurring.
Joy, hello...
Carol asked what the significance of miasmatic indications is (she
asked somewhat more specifically, and I gave a rather more general
answer). I gave an answer. I don't think I've seen *your* answer yet.
(What does "fickle" mean in this context?) But hey, if you read this
as an "answer" from me, then you're absolutely living on a different
planet. Did you read this as my suggestion that one should just use
cortisone and have done with it? If you *did* read it as meaning that,
then I should just give up now, because you're not hearing anything I'm
saying.
If you did *not* read it as meaning that, then why are you pretending
that's what I said?
Is this a discussion, or are you just looking for ways to ridicule me?
...
Ask Hahnemann.
If you re-read her question, you'll say that's
her impression of how many he's listed in that section of CD.
Again, re-read Carol's question.
So again, what's your answer to her question? (Remember her question,
the thing that started all this?)
Shannon