It was all recently posted here, and the two-bit synpopsis
It seems a useless and possibly misleading excercise to produce aurum Hahnemanni,
when there is adequate information showing:
1) impossible to produce aurum Hahnemanni exactly; as Hahnemann states his original material contained bout 3.5% unspecified impurities.
2) Burnett has shown that "modern" Aurum @ 99.99% pure shows the same pathogenesis as Hahnemann's original proving.
ergo: there is not any need to try to do what is impossibly anyway.
AND: it just adds confusion.
Caust. Hahnemanni is a whole 'nother scenario; people have successfully made it according to Hahnemann's exact manufacturing notes; it is therefore "THE" Causticum to use, as "improvements" in manufacturing process have resulted in a Rx containing ammonium causticum instead of the original kali causticum.
I have not tried to track down provings of ammonium causticum, but I can read Caust. in any of my favorite MM and know that most of the proving info came from Hahnemann, & go to Hahnemann's "Chronic Diseases" and read the original.
warm wishes,
david 510.776.5914 fax: 510.336.6671
www.holistiq.com
www.DavidHartley.com
I.T. support:
www.cafegratitude.com
co-founder:
www.GratefulMindandBody.com
web developer:
www.iamResourceful.com