Abortions/Miscarriages
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2002 6:49 am
I have had this particular wonderment for the longest time: In the
repertory and the MM both, when the word ABORTION is mentioned, it
refers to MISCARRIAGE. To the best of my understanding and that of many
Homeopaths and teachers I have asked, there is no clear rubric for
ABORTION in the sense that we have been discussing here for a couple of
days now.
Can someone knowing clarify these issues for me please?
There is a clear distinction between the two. Miscarriage is a process
that occurs by itself, one can call it 'naturally', in the sense of it
not being initiated CONSCIOUSLY nor MECHANICALLY by the pregnant woman
or by any other external factor, and in that sense can be seen as a sign
of pathology or mistunement of the Life Force. Abortion, as we have
been discussing is what is otherwise known as 'artificial miscarriage',
or a process initiated consciously, either by the woman or by some other
external factor. Homeopathically, this can be conceived of as an
OCCURRENT. These two processes are distinct and should thus be
distinguished also in the rubrics and the MM.
How are the existing 34 rubrics for ABORTION (sometimes with
'miscarriage in parethesis...) relate to these two distinct terms then?
and if they don't relate at all (which I think is the case) to the
'artificial abortion', which rubrics should be used in cases of these
conscious abortions?
Sara
repertory and the MM both, when the word ABORTION is mentioned, it
refers to MISCARRIAGE. To the best of my understanding and that of many
Homeopaths and teachers I have asked, there is no clear rubric for
ABORTION in the sense that we have been discussing here for a couple of
days now.
Can someone knowing clarify these issues for me please?
There is a clear distinction between the two. Miscarriage is a process
that occurs by itself, one can call it 'naturally', in the sense of it
not being initiated CONSCIOUSLY nor MECHANICALLY by the pregnant woman
or by any other external factor, and in that sense can be seen as a sign
of pathology or mistunement of the Life Force. Abortion, as we have
been discussing is what is otherwise known as 'artificial miscarriage',
or a process initiated consciously, either by the woman or by some other
external factor. Homeopathically, this can be conceived of as an
OCCURRENT. These two processes are distinct and should thus be
distinguished also in the rubrics and the MM.
How are the existing 34 rubrics for ABORTION (sometimes with
'miscarriage in parethesis...) relate to these two distinct terms then?
and if they don't relate at all (which I think is the case) to the
'artificial abortion', which rubrics should be used in cases of these
conscious abortions?
Sara