Provings
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2002 3:38 am
My replies to Dave's message appear in capital letters (to differentiate, my
answers--also to give the subliminal message that I am right because my
letters are bigger!
) )
HAVE YOU PARTICIPATED IN PROVINGS?
Yeah, I participated in one proving- a good experience for me..
There will always be quite a few viewpoints on "the state" of a particular
remedy, for the simple reason that NO INDIVIDUAL will perceive nor express
"the state" exactly as another..
I CERTAINLY AGREE WITH THIS. THE SYMPTOMS AND FEELINGS THAT ARE EXPERIENCED
BY A NUMBER OF PROVERS ARE THE MOST RELEVANT IN PERCEIVING THE STATE OF A
PARTICULAR REMEDY. USUALLY THERE ARE SOME STRONG THEMES THAT MANY PROVERS
SHARE. AND THERE ARE SOME VERY SENSITIVE PROVERS WHO ARE COMPLETELY TAKEN
OVER BY THE PROVING. JAYESH SHAH SAYS THAT EVERY WORD OF SUCH PROVERS
BECOMES IMPORTANT.
FOR THE INDIVIDUAL PROVER, THE BIGGEST EYE-OPENER OF THE PROVING EXPERIENCE
IS HOW ARBITRARY OUR "NORMAL" STATE TRULY IS, AFTER SEEING HOW OUR THOUGHTS,
FEELINGS, AND BELIEFS ARE CHANGED BY BEING EXPOSED TO A DIFFERENT STATE.
though we do need to attempt to know each
remedy as part of "the living materia medica" (as I've heard it
expressed) -I find that for myself, I don't really feel that I have a good
feel for a remedy until I research it for a case (& better yet, where it is
actually the one used in a case.)
YES, AND EVEN BETTER YET, WHEN IT IS ACTUALLY THE ONE THAT ENDS UP BEING
CURATIVE!! IT IS SO CONFUSING WHEN A REMEDY THAT SEEMED TO FIT COMPLETELY
JUST DOESN'T WORK. THE PROVING EXPERIENCE HAS HELPED ME LEARN TO READ
BETWEEN THE LINES OF PROVINGS AND MATERIA MEDICA TO PERCEIVE THE
ENERGY/STATE BEHIND THE WORDS.
Many MM's exist; reading a number of them will help us to understand the
idealistic "state" - "of the remedy" (itself) - and will reveal
"Strange/Rare/Peculiar" (SRP) or "Strange/Exceptional/Unusual/Odd" (SEUO)
symptoms ... as discussed in Organon, Aph 153:
"In the search for a homoeopathically specific remedy, that is, in the
comparison of the complex of the natural disease's signs with the symptoms
sets of the available medicines (in order to find among them an artificial
disease potence that corresponds in similarity to the malady to be cure)
the more STRIKING, EXCEPTIONAL, UNUSUAL, AND ODD (Characteristic) signs and
symptoms of the disease case are to especially and almost solely kept in
view. THESE ABOVE ALL, MUST CORRESPOND TO VERY SIMILAR ONES IN THE
SYMPTOMS SET OF THE MEDICINES SOUGHT if it is to be the most fitting one
for cure. The more common and indeterminate symptoms (lack of appetite,
headache, lassitude, restless sleep, discomfort, etc.) are the be seen with
almost every disease and medicine and thus deserve little attention unless
they are more closely characterized."
THESE PECULIAR SYMPTOMS CAN BE THE MOST USEFUL FOR FINDING THE PRECISE
REMEDY. I CAME TO A SUCCESSFUL RX OF "BUTTERFLY", FOR INSTANCE, IN A CHILD
WHO WAS INTENSELY AFRAID OF CHICKENS, BUT NOT OF MUCH BIGGER AND MORE
THREATENING ANIMALS, SUCH AS DOGS. THE INDIAN HOMEOPATHS REALLY EMPASIZE
THESE "PQRS" ("PECULIAR, QUEER, RARE, AND STRANGE") SYMPTOMS. IN FACT,
USUALLY IF THE REMEDY DOESN'T COVER THEM, IT WON'T BE THE SIMILLIMUM, AT
LEAST IN A WELL-PROVEN REMEDY.
WOULD YOU LIKE MY REVIEW OF JAYESH SHAH'S 3-YEAR PROFESSIONAL SEMINAR?
REPLY SEPARATELY IF YOU WOULD.
CHARLOTTE GILRUTH
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
answers--also to give the subliminal message that I am right because my
letters are bigger!
HAVE YOU PARTICIPATED IN PROVINGS?
Yeah, I participated in one proving- a good experience for me..
There will always be quite a few viewpoints on "the state" of a particular
remedy, for the simple reason that NO INDIVIDUAL will perceive nor express
"the state" exactly as another..
I CERTAINLY AGREE WITH THIS. THE SYMPTOMS AND FEELINGS THAT ARE EXPERIENCED
BY A NUMBER OF PROVERS ARE THE MOST RELEVANT IN PERCEIVING THE STATE OF A
PARTICULAR REMEDY. USUALLY THERE ARE SOME STRONG THEMES THAT MANY PROVERS
SHARE. AND THERE ARE SOME VERY SENSITIVE PROVERS WHO ARE COMPLETELY TAKEN
OVER BY THE PROVING. JAYESH SHAH SAYS THAT EVERY WORD OF SUCH PROVERS
BECOMES IMPORTANT.
FOR THE INDIVIDUAL PROVER, THE BIGGEST EYE-OPENER OF THE PROVING EXPERIENCE
IS HOW ARBITRARY OUR "NORMAL" STATE TRULY IS, AFTER SEEING HOW OUR THOUGHTS,
FEELINGS, AND BELIEFS ARE CHANGED BY BEING EXPOSED TO A DIFFERENT STATE.
though we do need to attempt to know each
remedy as part of "the living materia medica" (as I've heard it
expressed) -I find that for myself, I don't really feel that I have a good
feel for a remedy until I research it for a case (& better yet, where it is
actually the one used in a case.)
YES, AND EVEN BETTER YET, WHEN IT IS ACTUALLY THE ONE THAT ENDS UP BEING
CURATIVE!! IT IS SO CONFUSING WHEN A REMEDY THAT SEEMED TO FIT COMPLETELY
JUST DOESN'T WORK. THE PROVING EXPERIENCE HAS HELPED ME LEARN TO READ
BETWEEN THE LINES OF PROVINGS AND MATERIA MEDICA TO PERCEIVE THE
ENERGY/STATE BEHIND THE WORDS.
Many MM's exist; reading a number of them will help us to understand the
idealistic "state" - "of the remedy" (itself) - and will reveal
"Strange/Rare/Peculiar" (SRP) or "Strange/Exceptional/Unusual/Odd" (SEUO)
symptoms ... as discussed in Organon, Aph 153:
"In the search for a homoeopathically specific remedy, that is, in the
comparison of the complex of the natural disease's signs with the symptoms
sets of the available medicines (in order to find among them an artificial
disease potence that corresponds in similarity to the malady to be cure)
the more STRIKING, EXCEPTIONAL, UNUSUAL, AND ODD (Characteristic) signs and
symptoms of the disease case are to especially and almost solely kept in
view. THESE ABOVE ALL, MUST CORRESPOND TO VERY SIMILAR ONES IN THE
SYMPTOMS SET OF THE MEDICINES SOUGHT if it is to be the most fitting one
for cure. The more common and indeterminate symptoms (lack of appetite,
headache, lassitude, restless sleep, discomfort, etc.) are the be seen with
almost every disease and medicine and thus deserve little attention unless
they are more closely characterized."
THESE PECULIAR SYMPTOMS CAN BE THE MOST USEFUL FOR FINDING THE PRECISE
REMEDY. I CAME TO A SUCCESSFUL RX OF "BUTTERFLY", FOR INSTANCE, IN A CHILD
WHO WAS INTENSELY AFRAID OF CHICKENS, BUT NOT OF MUCH BIGGER AND MORE
THREATENING ANIMALS, SUCH AS DOGS. THE INDIAN HOMEOPATHS REALLY EMPASIZE
THESE "PQRS" ("PECULIAR, QUEER, RARE, AND STRANGE") SYMPTOMS. IN FACT,
USUALLY IF THE REMEDY DOESN'T COVER THEM, IT WON'T BE THE SIMILLIMUM, AT
LEAST IN A WELL-PROVEN REMEDY.
WOULD YOU LIKE MY REVIEW OF JAYESH SHAH'S 3-YEAR PROFESSIONAL SEMINAR?
REPLY SEPARATELY IF YOU WOULD.
CHARLOTTE GILRUTH
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]