PS Fear of the Invisible book on viruses & polio and AIDS and HIV
Posted: Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:03 pm
Your information is old, Irene.
This isn't info about viruses being made by the cells...........that is in info I don't have access to, to produce here
But.................more on the lies about disease-causing viruses
google stefan lanka
for one and then all the other info I have sent
http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/slartefact.htm
A little virology
Viruses are essentially just packages of genetic information enclosed in a coat which consists of proteins. They can reproduce themselves only by infecting a suitable host cell and appropriating the chemical machinery they find there. The proteins making up the viruses are characteristic for each species of virus. Apart from enveloping and transporting the genetic information intact, the composition of proteins for a given virus results in a specific shape for the virus particle.
This much is generally known. Less well-known is the existence of other particles which look like viruses but aren't, and are nonchalantly referred to as "virus-like" particles. Such particles are far from rare, found, for example, always in placentas, and very frequently in the artificial environment of laboratory cell cultures. They have served to muddy the waters considerably as far as AIDS research is concerned, because particles just like these have been called HIV. To date, none of these has been characterised and shown to exist as an entity which one may justifiably call a virus.
and more
http://www.oikos.org/AIDS/intlanka.htm
http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/news/kkletter.htm
http://www.whale.to/a/lanka.html
"No! Because none of those "viruses" that claim to make you ill, like smallpox, polio, hepatitis, aids, ebola, measles, mumps, rubella and tic viruses has ever been seen, isolated and proven as existent "
http://alt.nntp2http.com/medical/2007/0 ... 4c450.html
"
1.b) Photographs of viruses, maintained to be diseasecausing,
in a human or an animal or in a bodily fluid from any such -
in which of course such a virus is supposed to multiply and
in which it supposedly exists in vast quantities - do not
exist! This every layman can check on: Is there, or is there
not, a photo of a virus claimed to be diseasecausing, about
which it is maintained that it is found in a human or in a
bodily fluid?
All photographs of viruses which are maintained to be dis-
easecausing are photographs of quite normal component parts
of cells or of artificially produced particles. In all
scientific publications which claim that photos contained in
them are photos of diseasecausing viruses, this even is
described. Every layman who understands English can check on
this: By reading!
"
againgoogle stefan lanka
At 01:18 AM 9/11/2008, you wrote:
This isn't info about viruses being made by the cells...........that is in info I don't have access to, to produce here
But.................more on the lies about disease-causing viruses
google stefan lanka
for one and then all the other info I have sent
http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/slartefact.htm
A little virology
Viruses are essentially just packages of genetic information enclosed in a coat which consists of proteins. They can reproduce themselves only by infecting a suitable host cell and appropriating the chemical machinery they find there. The proteins making up the viruses are characteristic for each species of virus. Apart from enveloping and transporting the genetic information intact, the composition of proteins for a given virus results in a specific shape for the virus particle.
This much is generally known. Less well-known is the existence of other particles which look like viruses but aren't, and are nonchalantly referred to as "virus-like" particles. Such particles are far from rare, found, for example, always in placentas, and very frequently in the artificial environment of laboratory cell cultures. They have served to muddy the waters considerably as far as AIDS research is concerned, because particles just like these have been called HIV. To date, none of these has been characterised and shown to exist as an entity which one may justifiably call a virus.
and more
http://www.oikos.org/AIDS/intlanka.htm
http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/news/kkletter.htm
http://www.whale.to/a/lanka.html
"No! Because none of those "viruses" that claim to make you ill, like smallpox, polio, hepatitis, aids, ebola, measles, mumps, rubella and tic viruses has ever been seen, isolated and proven as existent "
http://alt.nntp2http.com/medical/2007/0 ... 4c450.html
"
1.b) Photographs of viruses, maintained to be diseasecausing,
in a human or an animal or in a bodily fluid from any such -
in which of course such a virus is supposed to multiply and
in which it supposedly exists in vast quantities - do not
exist! This every layman can check on: Is there, or is there
not, a photo of a virus claimed to be diseasecausing, about
which it is maintained that it is found in a human or in a
bodily fluid?
All photographs of viruses which are maintained to be dis-
easecausing are photographs of quite normal component parts
of cells or of artificially produced particles. In all
scientific publications which claim that photos contained in
them are photos of diseasecausing viruses, this even is
described. Every layman who understands English can check on
this: By reading!
"
againgoogle stefan lanka
At 01:18 AM 9/11/2008, you wrote: