Page 1 of 1

Entanglement redux

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 10:43 am
by art
If homeopathy is every going to have a chance of having some credibility with the existing scientific community, it's overdue for homeopathic clinicians to join forces with quantum physicists or to learn the field themselves. Being a lurker on minutus, I've observed too many times where contributors do not exhibit rigor in analytic thinking and/or investigate theory deeply, which I find very troubling and surprising considering that I thought analytic thinking and investigating deeply were the tools of the homeopathic clinical methodology.

--
CAL, A.B.D in Philosophy, J.D., M.A.

Re: Entanglement redux

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 10:49 am
by Soroush Ebrahimi
Dear Cal
You wrote:
"I've observed too many times where contributors do not exhibit rigor in analytic thinking and/or investigate theory deeply"
Examples please so that contributors can do something about it.
When do you think Quantum physicists will catch up with the Homeopathic effect?
Rgds
Soroush

________________________________

From: minutus@yahoogroups.com [mailto:minutus@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of art
Sent: 15 August 2008 19:47
To: minutus@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Minutus] Entanglement redux
If homeopathy is every going to have a chance of having some credibility with the existing scientific community, it's overdue for homeopathic clinicians to join forces with quantum physicists or to learn the field themselves. Being a lurker on minutus, I've observed too many times where contributors do not exhibit rigor in analytic thinking and/or investigate theory deeply, which I find very troubling and surprising considering that I thought analytic thinking and investigating deeply were the tools of the homeopathic clinical methodology.

--
CAL, A.B.D in Philosophy, J.D., M.A.
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.6.3/1614 - Release Date: 8/15/2008 5:29 PM

Re: Entanglement redux

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 2:49 pm
by Luise Kunkle
Hi,

Very interesting.

Why don't you give some specific examples from posts? It would be - to
me - an interesting and relevant discussion.

Regards

Luise
--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========

Re: Entanglement redux

Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 5:30 pm
by Irene de Villiers
On Aug 16, 2008, at 1:49 AM,
wrote:
I'm so glad you expressed this the right way round:-)
Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."