[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 59351
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on null
Minutus • Constitutional versus specific remedy
Page 1 of 2

Constitutional versus specific remedy

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 6:05 am
by Shannon Nelson
Reading up for a case, I came across this bit, which speaks directly to
a debate we've periodically had, i.e. the usefulness (or not) of
prescribing "constitutionally" (and here I use the word in the sense of
chronic remedy, I guess) for specific and/or local problems. So, I
thought I would share it. This is from a seminar presentation on a
case of debilitating sciatica, which had received extensive treatment
by other homeopaths without result, and he describes how he identified
the remedy that cured. (It's also a nice piece on the remedy Ginseng.)

She vividly describes the patient, her situation, and some
characteristic (and unusual) responses. She lists the numerous
remedies the patient has already had for the sciatica, without benefit.
She remarks, "At the time, I did not know what remedies she had
received homeopathically, but I knew a number of excellent homeopaths
had prescribed for her. So, I figured I could remove the regular back
remedies from consideration. [...] (She decides to focus on those
remedies listed under the rubric "Courageous.")
- I read the small remedies until I came to Ginseng. I read
Boericke. I found nothing of compelling significance there. [...]
- According to Clarke in his Dictionary of Practical Materia
Medica, J.H. Henry said that Ginseng acts on the lower part of the
spinal marrow, as indicated by "bruised pain in the small of the back
and thighs (on rising from the bed)." Henry also mentions "nightly
digging in the right lower limb from the hip to the big toe, cramp,
pains from right hip to toes." Henry considers Ginseng specific for
lumbago, sciatica, and chronic rheumatism, with frequent desire to
urinate.
Ginseng is an aromatic stimulant and removes feelings of fatigue,
imparting a joyous sense of vigor and elasticity to the limbs,
especially the upper limbs, and clearness of the mind...the right side
of the body is most affected. Many symptoms are worse at night and from
bending or turning, descending stairs, or sitting. [N.B.: Some of the
preceding are examples of where *positive* traits can be used in
prescribing. In the case, just this sort of extraordinarily positive
attitude in the face of tremendous suffering and "challenge" was a
striking feature. So one isn't trying to "cure" her "joyous sense of
vigor" etc.; but they are nonetheless characteristic and indicative of
a state which *is* cured by the remedy.]
- Clarke says the mood is "quiet and contented, with good
courage." The mind is generally calm, but the patient can have
impatient impulses and a fear of accidents. (She noted that before
taking the remedy she had a tremendous fear of accidents. When she was
a passenger in a car, she was terrified there would be an accident.
This symptom resolved with the remedy.) I do believe this is a common,
but under-represented, symptom. Many people who have lived with a lot
of pain can't tolerate the possibility of another injury."

[The speaker continues:]
"How Do We Find Remedies?
- There would have been no way to find this remedy by
repertorizing her back symptomatology. Even in retrospect, it is not
possible to find this remedy by looking through back symptoms in
ReferenceWorks. I don't think this problem is unique to this case.
- The musculoskeletal rubrics, as a group, are weak and
incomplete. Osteopathic physicians who treated patients 50 years ago
say that people's bodies were much healthier then. They were easier to
treat and help. Something terrible has happened to our tissues, as we
can see in problems like chronic fatigue syndrome, environmental
illness, AIDS, and other unknown and undefined weaknesses in the
system. The skeletal system inevitably reflects these problems;
however, the repertory does not yet do so.
- So, how do we find remedies? About 30 to 40 percent of the time
the back rubrics will lead you to the remedy, such as finding Kali
carbonicum in Case Number 1. About 20 to 30 percent of the time, the
essence will lead you to the remedy and the materia medica will confirm
the back pathology, as Clarke confirms Ginseng so nicely for us. The
rest of the time, about 20 or 40 percent, the remedy cannot be
confirmed with back symptomatology. These are the cases we too often
miss. We must base the remedy on the essence and generalities we find.
We must think of as many ways as possible to come to know the core of
the person. In this case, I believe her central core is represented by
courage."

And further:
" The Courage of Other Remedies
- Other remedies are courageous in different ways. Persons
needing Ignatia develop a hard shell so as to endure the world's
assaults on their sensitive systems. Within the confines of this hard
covering, they are capable of considerable fortitude in very difficult
situations. Tabaccum has a kind of exhilarated fierceness that drives
them to run over the hot coals of their pain. Phosphorus people tend to
float over situations and move forward almost untouched by the
awfulness that they must overcome. Or, perhaps, Phosphorus people tend
to become involved in awful situations because of their sensitivity to
others - situations that others might more wisely avoid.
Pathological Courage?
- Did courage in these Ginseng cases have a tinge of pathology?
Possibly. In the first case, she may have pushed herself too hard, too
sure of her own vital, physical strength. Whereas some cultures demand
a lot of emotional suppression, as we have seen in some of the English
and some of the Asian cultures, perhaps America drives people of talent
to "burn out" and pushes most of us to our limits. Aristotle said that
core virtues are based on a balance between two extremes. Courage is
the balance between recklessness and cowardice on either side.
- Our greatest strength can also be our weakness. Many tragedies
are written from this perspective. So, in this case, we can see her as
trudging through hardship with fortitude, creativity, and discipline -
surviving a winter that might destroy someone else. And we might only
suppose that her vitality and strength also prompted her to try to
survive mountain ranges with fierce blizzards. Such an attempt could
certainly jeopardize her health and well-being.

Look to the Best
- On the other hand, I think it is dangerous to repeatedly see
people in a pathological light. In the Organon of Medicine, Hahnemann
initially talked about the incredible healing and positive power of the
vital force. I believe that, like osteopaths, he too had an awe and
respect for this vital force. As many religious traditions state, if we
look to what is best in the person we can link with their vital force
and people will heal. If we sense what moves them and their core of
genius - where their heroism, courage, tenderness, and concern lie -
then we will know them. Then, we will find the remedies that most
reflect the deepest part of our patients, and they will heal."

Re: Constitutional versus specific remedy

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 2:46 pm
by Luise Kunkle
Hi Shannon,

very interesting.

However, there is one item I have to contradict:
[..]

. In the Organon of Medicine, Hahnemann initially

Where does he do so????

Regards

Luise
--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========

Re: Constitutional versus specific remedy

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 3:13 pm
by Luise Kunkle
Hi Shannon,

digging a bit deeper I must say that I do cannot really see where this
case illustrates the point the lecturer was trying to make:

In Synthesis (book) repertory ginseng is listed among the remedies for
sciatica - with a reference to John Clarke's *clinical* repertory.

So IMO ginseng should have come up using the clinical symptoms of this
patient even by using to start with the "name" sciatica (in the
German version of Synthesis it is "Ischialgie", which is not really a
"name", since it means "pain of the sciatic nerve" or "pain connected
with the sciatic nerve". This is not a "name" but a description.

Regards

Luise
--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========

Re: Constitutional versus specific remedy

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 5:16 pm
by Shannon Nelson
You mean where in the article snippets?
Well, Hahnemann also talks about how the VF's incredible healing
ability becomes thwarted by chronic disease, and in this ginseng case,
that incredible power is released by the remedy, after which healing is
speedily accomplished. But I'm guessing that's not what you meant...
I don't understand what you are contradicting, tho...?
Shannon

Re: Constitutional versus specific remedy

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 5:53 pm
by Tanya Marquette
i guess it depends on what reperatory is used.
my murphy's or kent do not list ginseng, but my
radar does.
tanya

Re: Constitutional versus specific remedy

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 10:14 pm
by Shannon Nelson
Hi Luise,

Since we don't have a detailed summary of the symptoms as the patient
gave them, there's no way to see whether we could have begun with that
same information and come to the same conclusion (ginseng, I mean).
I'm only taking the writer's word for it that straightforward
repertorization was not going to solve this case. My guess is that if
the remedy came through *from the physicals* in any sort of obvious
way, one of the (apparently) several (reportedly) excellent homeopaths
who'd treated her previously, would have arrived at it.

In my experience, more often than not repertorization yields a number
of possible remedies, and from there you need to decide *which* among
the "candidates" fits the case more appropriately. Sometimes there are
a LOT of contenders! I don't know how long ago Ginseng entered into
our materia medica (and I'm not going to take time to look :-) ), so
don't know whether she (and the other homeopaths on the case) "ought"
to have considered it as a "sciatica remedy", but if:
- the homeopath was focusing on more familiar remedies (as in, "when
you see hoofprints, think 'horse,' not 'zebra.'") or
- they were looking for "back pain" remedies and Ginseng had not made
it to the appropriate rubric(s) (yet?); or
- if they *did* consider the overall, broader case, but had considered
her indefatigable courage and endless good cheer to be simply
"healthy", not appropriate to repertorize (and I confess I do find this
a sticky point)... I find it easy enough to see how the remedy had
been missed previously!

I think it *usually* the case that the constitutional / chronic remedy
will cover, at least in a *general* way, most chronic issues that crop
up (by which I mean that you would at least find that remedy listed in
the major applicable rubrics); it would be surprising to me if that
were not the case. But often there *aren't* a lot of good SRP / PQRS
symptoms to point conclusively to a nice, tidy trauma or tissue or
"specific" remedy; instead (again, my limited experience) we have to
take what we can get--however vague or incomplete--and do what we can
with it. From there we have a choice to either:
- make a "best guess" among trauma or tissue or "specific" remedies, or
- look at the broader chronic (sometimes called "constitutional") case
and see whether there is a remedy that suits *both* the preexisting
chronic case and also the presenting injury or other main complaint.

That latter approach is what I thought this case a nice illustration
and explanation of. Since Ginseng is already recognized as covering
that type of injury (along with roughly a zillion other remedies!) it's
not such a stretch; I've also seen other cases, tho, where the chronic
remedy was *not* known as necessarily encompassing the presenting
complaint, but *still* it was given, on basis of a very good fit with
the chronic case--and did also resolve the (supposedly not-covered)
presenting complaint.

Does that do anything for you?
:-)
Shannon

Re: Constitutional versus specific remedy

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 10:18 pm
by Shannon Nelson
Also, this case was presented in 1993, don't know when it was taken.

Re: Constitutional versus specific remedy

Posted: Sat Aug 16, 2008 10:28 pm
by Tanya Marquette
in 1993 computer software was just beginning to make its appearence
in homeopathy. i still recall the discussion about using it in a class and
the
person teaching was very opposed to it. of course within the year he
bought a program but still discouraged the class from using it.

tanya

Re: Constitutional versus specific remedy

Posted: Sun Aug 17, 2008 11:01 pm
by Luise Kunkle
Hi Shannon,
No. I mean where in the Organon does he speak about the incredible
healing power of the life force?

Regards

Luise
--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========

Re: Constitutional versus specific remedy

Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 2:01 pm
by Shannon Nelson
Hi Luise,
Ah, I see where you're going.
Okay, that is not the way I *recall* Hahnemann talking about it.
He talks about it as being automatic...
But that's a whole different tangent from what the article addresses,
or what I was trying to bring out. Why do you feel that's an important
point? I'm not quite getting it...