Minutus

At 03:00 AM 6/27/2008, you wrote:
HI Shannon,
You can keep replying but I practiced 4th edition in my life before, during and after homeopathy school and within 1 year of practicing I was very frustrated. I did know David LIttle's works and writings from these lists and also signed onto his course and started to finally comprehend it all and then by happenstance, discovered Dr. Luc's clarification and teachings.

I've been there - 4th edition - and I see MUCH MUCH better - gentler and faster results with 5th and 6th edition.

So, I've been there and I know both ways and I choose 5th and 6th edition for self and patients.

I had very little recourse with dry potencies -had to wait the month at least. And people had to suffer aggravations with little to do for them, causing them suffering and also losing people to homeopathy.

I didn't tear down specific people - just pointed out what I know to be true (based on what Hahnemann found to be true.)
I chose not to go kicking and screaming into 5th and 6th edition.

Requires minor follow up within first few days to week but dose & potency can be adjusted sooner and if aggravations, short lasting and easy to adjust soon.

How do you as a 4th edition prescriber adjust anything after first dry dose is given before you have waited long enough to see if 'works'?
How do you give another dry dose and adjust that potency so it is different as Hahnemann instructed, giving VF a different potency with subsequent doses? How do you work with an aggravation caused by that dry dose?

I will continue to speak out for people out there seeing homeopathy and a faster gentler cure.

I'm tearing down the method of dry dosing and bringing it into the light for others so they don't waste their time, money and health, in many cases.

Been with 4th edition and will never go back.

Sheri
Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
http://www.wellwithin1.com/homeo.htm & http://www.wellwihtin1.com/vaccine.htm
ONLINE/Email classes in Homeopathy; Vaccine Dangers; Childhood Diseases

Hi Sheri,

would that (below) mean that Hahnemann until 1822 at the latest, v.
Boenninghausen all through his practice, the treatment of all the
"masters" of US homeopathy like Hering, Kent, Nash, Close, Clarke,
Boger........ was inferior to that of David Little and Luc de
Schepper? I think we should let history decide that:-)

Also:

In Germany treatment with the Q potencies has had a 50 years'
tradtion. Ever since Dr. Voegeli from Switzerland and Dr. Eichelberger
(who both changed to this method and stayed with it) taught homeopathy
and wrote their books, many German homeopaths have experimented with
them. Some use then used them almost exclusively, some changed byck to
dry doses, some use one or the other method in line with their own
criteria of when to use them.

In India also they seem to have been known for quite some time but
are hardly ever used.

So, as with every other method - the variety is here to stay, I think.
It is good that by your PR-efforts the method gets better-known, that
more homeopaths will try it out. Some will stay with it - some won't!

So I consider your efforts to be well worth it.

However, you should consider what Shannon says:

"YOU KNOW THIS, so why do you keep pretending it's not so? Building
up the
down

For the sake of what you are trying to promote: showing the positive
sides of one's own convictions is much more effective than trying to
tear down those of others!

Do we need yet more strife inside homeopathy than we have already???
Regards

Luise
--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========

Thanks Luise--well put!!
Shannon