Dr. Ramakrishnan
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2002 3:01 pm
Dear colleagues,
I believe that Homoeopathy is a medicine of experience
before a medicine of theory. Dr. Ramakrishnan's
experience is important to me because he has seen more
cases of cancer in 40 years than any homoeopath alive.
I am keenly interested to know what he learned through
treating 5000 cases of cancer including his own
brother and sister who succumbed despite his best
efforts. He could claim a reasonable success rate for
cancer with classical homoeopathy, but he wanted more
than that, and he went outside the box to find it.
This was a bold move for a man who had spent twenty
years practising in the strictly classical way.
His method still requires insightful case-taking and
careful choices as homoeopaths, but he provides the
practitioner with a guide on how to defeat the
aggressive nature of this particular disease where
possible. He carefully states that he does not use
this method in other types of disease.
I hope we can do as we ask the non-believers to do -
try it properly, and examine the results. We don't
need to know how it works. This list would be an
excellent forum to share our results, and perhaps at
some point we will understand the how and why of it.
Best regards,
Tracy Poizner
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
I believe that Homoeopathy is a medicine of experience
before a medicine of theory. Dr. Ramakrishnan's
experience is important to me because he has seen more
cases of cancer in 40 years than any homoeopath alive.
I am keenly interested to know what he learned through
treating 5000 cases of cancer including his own
brother and sister who succumbed despite his best
efforts. He could claim a reasonable success rate for
cancer with classical homoeopathy, but he wanted more
than that, and he went outside the box to find it.
This was a bold move for a man who had spent twenty
years practising in the strictly classical way.
His method still requires insightful case-taking and
careful choices as homoeopaths, but he provides the
practitioner with a guide on how to defeat the
aggressive nature of this particular disease where
possible. He carefully states that he does not use
this method in other types of disease.
I hope we can do as we ask the non-believers to do -
try it properly, and examine the results. We don't
need to know how it works. This list would be an
excellent forum to share our results, and perhaps at
some point we will understand the how and why of it.
Best regards,
Tracy Poizner
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings!
http://greetings.yahoo.com