Page 1 of 1

Blood suger & Irene De Villiers

Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 3:24 pm
by Bill Giman
Irene,

As much as I like your contributions & respect your opinions, you are appearing as a "know-it-all", (& also not spell checking your outgoing emails.)

Regards,
Bill G.
_____________________________________________________________
Click to shop for certified diamonds and engagement rings.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL212 ... 1234567890

Re: Blood suger & Irene De Villiers

Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 4:09 pm
by Rochelle
I think Irene is very knowledgeable so if you don;t like her posts just click the Delete . Know it all she is not IMHO - just very experienced.
Rochelle
Registered Homeopath
EFT(Advanced) Practitioner
www.southporthomeopathy.co.uk

Re: Blood suger & Irene De Villiers

Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 8:30 pm
by bty17859616
I enjoy Irene's contributions, they seem to come from someone who is experienced. Grace

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Bill Giman" wrote:
"know-it-all", (& also not spell checking your outgoing emails.)
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL212 ... IF16H38Vf6
qXayq4WO3zYnCX/?count=1234567890

Re: Blood suger & Irene De Villiers

Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 10:36 pm
by Jean Doherty
Indeed, and researched, Jean

Re: Blood suger & Irene De Villiers

Posted: Mon May 19, 2008 11:33 pm
by Shannon Nelson
I too love Irene's posts!
However, I'm guessing that Bill's remark was directed not at *what* she
was saying, but at the tone, which was more ... well, more judgmental i
guess, than hers usually are. (Personally I'll take any of Irene's
thoughts, in any tone at all! :-) But I think I also see where
Bill's--really rather gentle--remark was coming from.)
Group Hug! :-))
Shannon

Re: Blood suger & Irene De Villiers

Posted: Tue May 20, 2008 4:09 am
by Irene de Villiers
Thank you for the implied compliment. But in fact I am educated and
experienced in the areas I write opinions about (and am not inclined
to write in areas about which I know nothing) and I am freely sharing
my knowledge for your benefit - IF you choose to use the information.

If you choose to be insulting instead, I guess I feel that says
something about you, not me:-)

I note you do not challenge the information I provide with good
research to the contrary - which is another choice you have available
to you on reading my emails (along with deleting them for example) .

I have no problem having my email information and time spent on them
(and on the study time I invested and paid for behind it) questioned
as to validity - I welcome discussion on ANY subject I write about,
it's a great way to learn from others.
Feel free to try it, I have no monopoly on that.

As for the typo rate I have, I sure agree it is horrendous. I use a
spell checker that picks up some of it, but spell checkers are not
typo checkers. I do the best I can (hampered by neuropathy, poor
eyesight, weak muscles and other cortisol damage) - and accuracy in
typing is definitely NOT my strong area. My personal choice is two
or three emails of hopefully useful information over one that passes
the typing test.
I'm sorry if you would make a different choice - so please - If you
find it too bad to be worth reading, please delete.

Namaste,
Irene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."