Where is the right route for young homeopaths
Posted: Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:59 am
homeopath like any other field of study is growing and new ideas are coming up daily in this great therapeutic science. though the advancement is welcomed, the mode and means should be regulated. many homeopaths have come up with new approaches always trying to fulfill their presumed masters' philosophical principles and art of cure, and also trying to discredit others.
i know i have a strong inclination towards Rajan Sankaraan's but should i pour cold water on the work of Tinus Smit or George Vithuolkas? for those who have been in this field for long, the choice is easy, but for young homeopaths, it gets intelectually crowded and messy. i have listened to a homeopath with a strong following to Tinus discrediting the miasms advanced by Rajan Sankaraan's The Soul of Remedies.
i am in order to say that it is of little importance to consider a remedy as within a given miasmatic range?
Joakim Oria Ajanja
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62s ... o8Wcj9tAcJ
i know i have a strong inclination towards Rajan Sankaraan's but should i pour cold water on the work of Tinus Smit or George Vithuolkas? for those who have been in this field for long, the choice is easy, but for young homeopaths, it gets intelectually crowded and messy. i have listened to a homeopath with a strong following to Tinus discrediting the miasms advanced by Rajan Sankaraan's The Soul of Remedies.
i am in order to say that it is of little importance to consider a remedy as within a given miasmatic range?
Joakim Oria Ajanja
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62s ... o8Wcj9tAcJ