Homeopathy - Irene
Posted: Wed Apr 09, 2008 10:38 pm
Dear Irene,
1. I didn't want to hide the process of potentization. I really mean that it is not a necessary part of the definition.
2. I myself use potentized and diluted remedies in 99.99 percent of my cases. What I am saying is not on behalf of using crude remedies. I am just saying that it is not a 'necessary' part of the definition.
3. Do not consider these definitions just as definitions found in dictionaries. Unfortunately beyond many complex descriptions and techniques of homeopathy still those crude inaccurate definitions exist.
4. I know about HPUS but unfortunatley I should say that this error still exists here. I am not talking of legal issues these are all errors following errors!
5. What you say about the ENERGY interactions is a universal law. But this is applicable in any system of medicine. You can also say that the action of Propranolol, Antibiotics,... on the organisms are also at ENERGY level but in an antagonistic way. In Quantum mechanics you can consider any interaction of the parts which seem separate (In Bohm's explicate order level) as wave functions and interaction of energy patterns (in implicate order level). So everything can be considered as energy interaction. In your view, the conventional medicine can be also an Energy Medicine but with antipathic and allopathic interactions!!!
6. Of course I beleive that the alchemical process of dynamization, removes the 'corpora' part and releases the pure powerful 'arcanum' but again I emphasize that this is not a part of homeopathy definition. Imagine someone invents a machine that can induce different qualities of primary actions in the organism and uses this according the law of similars for curing patients. If you put potentization, dilutions,... in the definition, you can not call his method, homeopathy. But it is homeopathy!!
7. I have really no problem with your ENERGY interpretations but I do not know how this item is related to our discussion.
Thanks for participating in the discussion!
Regards,
Ardavan
Irene de Villiers wrote:
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
1. I didn't want to hide the process of potentization. I really mean that it is not a necessary part of the definition.
2. I myself use potentized and diluted remedies in 99.99 percent of my cases. What I am saying is not on behalf of using crude remedies. I am just saying that it is not a 'necessary' part of the definition.
3. Do not consider these definitions just as definitions found in dictionaries. Unfortunately beyond many complex descriptions and techniques of homeopathy still those crude inaccurate definitions exist.
4. I know about HPUS but unfortunatley I should say that this error still exists here. I am not talking of legal issues these are all errors following errors!
5. What you say about the ENERGY interactions is a universal law. But this is applicable in any system of medicine. You can also say that the action of Propranolol, Antibiotics,... on the organisms are also at ENERGY level but in an antagonistic way. In Quantum mechanics you can consider any interaction of the parts which seem separate (In Bohm's explicate order level) as wave functions and interaction of energy patterns (in implicate order level). So everything can be considered as energy interaction. In your view, the conventional medicine can be also an Energy Medicine but with antipathic and allopathic interactions!!!
6. Of course I beleive that the alchemical process of dynamization, removes the 'corpora' part and releases the pure powerful 'arcanum' but again I emphasize that this is not a part of homeopathy definition. Imagine someone invents a machine that can induce different qualities of primary actions in the organism and uses this according the law of similars for curing patients. If you put potentization, dilutions,... in the definition, you can not call his method, homeopathy. But it is homeopathy!!
7. I have really no problem with your ENERGY interpretations but I do not know how this item is related to our discussion.
Thanks for participating in the discussion!
Regards,
Ardavan
Irene de Villiers wrote:
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com