Homeopathy Debate at U of Conn - Andre Saine Shows Reality Homeopathy Success!
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2007 1:56 pm
Homeopathy Debate at U of Conn - Andre Saine Shows Reality Homeopathy Success!
I just viewed Andre Saines, all-too-brief, 9 minutes!
Fascinating................
I watched with only dial up access and it was fine!
Covers the history of epidemics and comparison of allopathic and
homeopathic death rates, primarily.
(also have viewed 1st & 2nd presenter)
Andre Saine's portion starts at 1 hour 47 minutes 14 seconds - 1:47:14 -
move the green and white bar to 1:47:14
And correction below - Israeli CAM researcher is #5; Iris Bell is #4
To get the slides just right click on the slide and click on copy and then
paste into a word program
Sheri
From Susan on another list...........
The homeopathy debate at the University of Connecticut last week is a MUST
SEE!
http://tinyurl.com/2qrhje
It's not really a debate but five presentations. The first, your typical
MD, homeopathy is fantasy, Avogadro's #, gov't homepathy funding is a waste
talk. Second a material scientist, not interested in homeopathy but water
structures, presenting the LATEST, like a few months ago, research on water
patterns to support water has memory, organization, etc that in turn can
support homeopathy claims. Third, an Israeli CAM researcher, not
specifically a homeopathy supporter. Fourth, Iris Bell, a scientist and
Arizona homeopath, who knows both extremely well, can talk down any critic
and does the research to support homeopathy as a complement to allopathy
Her personal website has the most succinct and realistic description of how
classical homeopathy fits it in overall chronic disease management. Google
her to find it. She is an excellent bridge between allopathy and
homeopathy. Her basic message, you can't measure homeopathic remedies like
pharmaceuticals because
remedies effect overall multidimensional function while drugs target
isolated systems and you need to look at the overall improvement.
Last, but certainly not least, was Andre Saine. He delivered a strong
vocal and emotionally charged clear message that homeopathy has a history
of delivering results. While more anectdotal than scientific, he had some
historic slides, some from the smallpox epidemic. Seeing all that history,
especially from pre-AMA USA medicine should instill a renewed sense of
vigor as to what was, what could have been and what should not let pass
into obscurity. If all homeopaths and supporters were as vocal as Andre
maybe the wave of anti-homeopathic actions happening can be averted.
The 160+ slides in this "debate" are excellent, the scientific ones are
new, some groundbreaking, everyone should obtain and use them. I don't see
a direct way to download them but you can view each one, enlarge, and hit
PRT-SC key (may also need to hold function key) on your keyboard then
insert or paste into Word or another program, like Paint to crop since this
is a full screen capture.
You may need a fast internet connection to easily watch but it will be
well worth your time.
Susan
Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
http://www.wellwithin1.com/homeo.htm
I just viewed Andre Saines, all-too-brief, 9 minutes!
Fascinating................
I watched with only dial up access and it was fine!
Covers the history of epidemics and comparison of allopathic and
homeopathic death rates, primarily.
(also have viewed 1st & 2nd presenter)
Andre Saine's portion starts at 1 hour 47 minutes 14 seconds - 1:47:14 -
move the green and white bar to 1:47:14
And correction below - Israeli CAM researcher is #5; Iris Bell is #4
To get the slides just right click on the slide and click on copy and then
paste into a word program
Sheri
From Susan on another list...........
The homeopathy debate at the University of Connecticut last week is a MUST
SEE!
http://tinyurl.com/2qrhje
It's not really a debate but five presentations. The first, your typical
MD, homeopathy is fantasy, Avogadro's #, gov't homepathy funding is a waste
talk. Second a material scientist, not interested in homeopathy but water
structures, presenting the LATEST, like a few months ago, research on water
patterns to support water has memory, organization, etc that in turn can
support homeopathy claims. Third, an Israeli CAM researcher, not
specifically a homeopathy supporter. Fourth, Iris Bell, a scientist and
Arizona homeopath, who knows both extremely well, can talk down any critic
and does the research to support homeopathy as a complement to allopathy
Her personal website has the most succinct and realistic description of how
classical homeopathy fits it in overall chronic disease management. Google
her to find it. She is an excellent bridge between allopathy and
homeopathy. Her basic message, you can't measure homeopathic remedies like
pharmaceuticals because
remedies effect overall multidimensional function while drugs target
isolated systems and you need to look at the overall improvement.
Last, but certainly not least, was Andre Saine. He delivered a strong
vocal and emotionally charged clear message that homeopathy has a history
of delivering results. While more anectdotal than scientific, he had some
historic slides, some from the smallpox epidemic. Seeing all that history,
especially from pre-AMA USA medicine should instill a renewed sense of
vigor as to what was, what could have been and what should not let pass
into obscurity. If all homeopaths and supporters were as vocal as Andre
maybe the wave of anti-homeopathic actions happening can be averted.
The 160+ slides in this "debate" are excellent, the scientific ones are
new, some groundbreaking, everyone should obtain and use them. I don't see
a direct way to download them but you can view each one, enlarge, and hit
PRT-SC key (may also need to hold function key) on your keyboard then
insert or paste into Word or another program, like Paint to crop since this
is a full screen capture.
You may need a fast internet connection to easily watch but it will be
well worth your time.
Susan
Sheri Nakken, former R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
http://www.wellwithin1.com/homeo.htm