online case TM/Dec.02 - follow up
Posted: Thu Jan 17, 2002 2:20 pm
Dear Tanya, thank you for your follow up notes.
Assessment:- she is still having vivid dreams. But I don't think these
dreams are part of her diseased state, in fact I feel they are part of her
healing process and a necessary outlet, perhaps she even likes dreaming in
this way. I don't think I would be prescribing on them. If she were coming
to you and saying, for example, "I never used to dream, I used to sleep
well, I cannot stand these dreams, I want to go back to having peaceful
sleep" etc etc, then, yes the dreams would be part of the diseased state and
would be part of the case analysis. However, having said that I feel that
when she does get her correct Rx these dreams might soften up somewhat and
play a less dominant role in her life - who knows. But they are interesting
to read though.
Is she opening up a bit? Is she letting some of the terror out through
therapy or is it the Rx working. I think I said before once that I felt that
this person is very good at bringing things to the foreground (at the moment
it is dreams and terror) but she doesn't know what to do when they are
there. This is one of the problems with therapy. From a distance, I
personally don't think that much has changed here.
You say "Unusual Sx to her - aversion to clothing round her neck" If you
look at EXTERNAL THROAT, CLOTHING AGG. you will find TARENTULA in italics
(Kent).
You say desire/amel for company. Where did this come from, I can't see
anything along these lines - can you clarify this please.
I still really think this is a Tarentula case, but only you can decide.
Perhaps others might shed some light on this fascinating case.
Hope this helps and thanks for sharing this with us.
Best wishes, Joy Lucas
Assessment:- she is still having vivid dreams. But I don't think these
dreams are part of her diseased state, in fact I feel they are part of her
healing process and a necessary outlet, perhaps she even likes dreaming in
this way. I don't think I would be prescribing on them. If she were coming
to you and saying, for example, "I never used to dream, I used to sleep
well, I cannot stand these dreams, I want to go back to having peaceful
sleep" etc etc, then, yes the dreams would be part of the diseased state and
would be part of the case analysis. However, having said that I feel that
when she does get her correct Rx these dreams might soften up somewhat and
play a less dominant role in her life - who knows. But they are interesting
to read though.
Is she opening up a bit? Is she letting some of the terror out through
therapy or is it the Rx working. I think I said before once that I felt that
this person is very good at bringing things to the foreground (at the moment
it is dreams and terror) but she doesn't know what to do when they are
there. This is one of the problems with therapy. From a distance, I
personally don't think that much has changed here.
You say "Unusual Sx to her - aversion to clothing round her neck" If you
look at EXTERNAL THROAT, CLOTHING AGG. you will find TARENTULA in italics
(Kent).
You say desire/amel for company. Where did this come from, I can't see
anything along these lines - can you clarify this please.
I still really think this is a Tarentula case, but only you can decide.
Perhaps others might shed some light on this fascinating case.
Hope this helps and thanks for sharing this with us.
Best wishes, Joy Lucas