bridging the gaps-future of homeopathy
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2002 12:04 pm
would like to know your opinion regarding the recent trends &innovative ideas in the system namely-dynamic provings-advocated by jermmy sherr and shankaran,group phenomenon,dream provings
promosalone-prescription on basis on mental syptoms alone,whats its significance
synthetic prescription,mineral kingdom approach-advocated by jan
kingdom approach in homeopathy,its utility in medicinal diagnosis -concepts of chaim rosental and shankaran
miasmatic approach-significance of newer miasms-typhoid,ringworm,cancer etc..
namely,few which i have heared.
each one trying to explain homeopathy on contemporary sciences from their clinical experince on oneside but mostly pseudosciences,intutional approach,abstractive thinking,speculations?
homeopathy been only 200 years old and during the time it emerging as a new hope-the medicne of the millinium!where efforts are going around the world to prove the scientificity of homeopathy,various research works on this path going on how much could we accomodate?
the resurgence around world-lot a mordern school doctors studying and witnessing proving of homeopathy in their daily practise,isn't time to think-what is really the science of homeopathy?
are these innovation really helpful and will it bridge the gaps of the various schools of homeopathy-the larger THE SCIENCE AND ART OF HOMEOPATHY?
how/what is the authority in homeopathy?
i dont critcise any body,because criticism arouse from ignorance as shankran have said
.but in science of homeopathy each one have face critisism be it from our patients,our fellow physcianns-is homeopathic scientific?can these small globules do any thing?
in a time where placebo affect is being known next comes the question-is it a placebo affect?
their need to think
i feel its really understand whats homeopathy,whats the real scope of homeopathy in present state,has it widdened or narrowed
.to question whats is homeopathy-to which master kent answered 'god alone knows',to which herbert.a.roberts said to 'a system of medicine based upon natural laws'.
is homeopathy a system sufficent unto its self or it theraputic method.
awating your resonses.
contact by-homeopathy2002@eth.net,or homeopath_rajiv@hotmail.com
(homeopathy is a principle,is ever capable of development,while principles remain same.)
.
wishing you a prosperous New year and much prosperous homeopathy
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
promosalone-prescription on basis on mental syptoms alone,whats its significance
synthetic prescription,mineral kingdom approach-advocated by jan
kingdom approach in homeopathy,its utility in medicinal diagnosis -concepts of chaim rosental and shankaran
miasmatic approach-significance of newer miasms-typhoid,ringworm,cancer etc..
namely,few which i have heared.
each one trying to explain homeopathy on contemporary sciences from their clinical experince on oneside but mostly pseudosciences,intutional approach,abstractive thinking,speculations?
homeopathy been only 200 years old and during the time it emerging as a new hope-the medicne of the millinium!where efforts are going around the world to prove the scientificity of homeopathy,various research works on this path going on how much could we accomodate?
the resurgence around world-lot a mordern school doctors studying and witnessing proving of homeopathy in their daily practise,isn't time to think-what is really the science of homeopathy?
are these innovation really helpful and will it bridge the gaps of the various schools of homeopathy-the larger THE SCIENCE AND ART OF HOMEOPATHY?
how/what is the authority in homeopathy?
i dont critcise any body,because criticism arouse from ignorance as shankran have said
.but in science of homeopathy each one have face critisism be it from our patients,our fellow physcianns-is homeopathic scientific?can these small globules do any thing?
in a time where placebo affect is being known next comes the question-is it a placebo affect?
their need to think
i feel its really understand whats homeopathy,whats the real scope of homeopathy in present state,has it widdened or narrowed
.to question whats is homeopathy-to which master kent answered 'god alone knows',to which herbert.a.roberts said to 'a system of medicine based upon natural laws'.
is homeopathy a system sufficent unto its self or it theraputic method.
awating your resonses.
contact by-homeopathy2002@eth.net,or homeopath_rajiv@hotmail.com
(homeopathy is a principle,is ever capable of development,while principles remain same.)
.
wishing you a prosperous New year and much prosperous homeopathy
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]