[H] Provings reliability

[shukribn]

In a message dated 1/11/02 1:28:46 PM Eastern Standard Time,
muller@ihug.co.nz writes:
You're not alone in what you said, look at the case with Julian Winston,
when he pointed out the problem with Animal Mind..book, a large group of
known homeopaths jumped up and down in condemn. the issues are about
personal relationships, about political correctness (OK to nonsense lest you
offend someone ), and keeping silent about the 20% absurdities because the
other 80% is pretty good, and not to forget the time , money, and effort
spent. Well, what happens is that it starts with 5% nonsense and sooner than
you think it's 70% that way, And even those 5% are enough to contaminate our
M. M. and Repertory, plus other damages. They went from proving a piece of
concrete from the Berlin wall, to proving wind, and one day they might prove
a Mcdonald hamburger. I can say that the vast majority, if not all of these
people who promote such things are folks who love homeopathy, but that's just
not enough.

I think the worst damage done by anyone, is that done by many of the well
known in the homeopathic community who maintain a state stillness and
quietness, whatever their reasons are. that certainly wasn't the case
with Hahnemann, boger, phatak, clarke, tyler, kent, hering, nash, guersney,
lippe or roberts etc.

Shukri
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]