Sheri Nakken wrote:
The common factor is intolerance of the views of others and forcing
one's views onto others.
Tolerance implies having a perspective but not trying to force others to
have the same one:-)
It's PART of homeopathy to see eveyone as an individual after all - with
individual constitutrional types etc.
It makes more sense to be tolerant, explain a good reason for one's
views, and let others either agree that the reason is good - or not:-)
None of us need force our views on others - it should be sufficient to
present them for others to like, dislike, use or delets:-)
No that is also extreme.
Everyone is using homeopathy here. Some are ADDING things to sup0port
the client and to cater for the FACT that things today are not as they
were in Hahnemann's time. Newer, more virulent and more suppressed
diseases have been devised and they do not respond to the old options alone.
That some people try to meet these challenges with systems ADDED to
the homeopathy at the core - does not mean they are not using homeopathy
or that they are using some other system instead - as your analogy would
imply.
So maybe you are seeing Bambi with too many or too few spots for
your liking - but it is still Bambi.
teach?
You mean to those already converted to your views:-)))
Up to you.
But the REAL challenge if you want to teach - would be to present such a
good argument for your views here - that those who have different ones,
change to yours........
or vice versa.
Namaste,
IRene
--
Irene de Villiers, B.Sc AASCA MCSSA D.I.Hom/D.Vet.Hom.
P.O. Box 4703 Spokane WA 99220.
www.angelfire.com/fl/furryboots/clickhere.html (Veterinary Homeopath.)
"Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt one doing it."