dreams
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2002 6:13 pm
dear tanya and everyone, a while ago i posted an email about how i analyze
dreams (in response to something tanya had posted and others had responded
to) and i was not quite accurate in what i said i do, so i want to try to be
more accurate here. i had originally said that i take the negative aspects
of the person - or place or thing. that is not necessarily so. if the
good, positive aspects of the person, place or thing are what jump out at me
in life, and the ambience and tone of the dream are positive, that is what i
focus on. sometimes i have to look at both the positive and negative to see
what the dream is telling me, or to figure out which i need to focus on in
the interpretation. i hope this clarifies and puts aright what i formerly
said. i love this list. thanks to all of you. sheila
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
dreams (in response to something tanya had posted and others had responded
to) and i was not quite accurate in what i said i do, so i want to try to be
more accurate here. i had originally said that i take the negative aspects
of the person - or place or thing. that is not necessarily so. if the
good, positive aspects of the person, place or thing are what jump out at me
in life, and the ambience and tone of the dream are positive, that is what i
focus on. sometimes i have to look at both the positive and negative to see
what the dream is telling me, or to figure out which i need to focus on in
the interpretation. i hope this clarifies and puts aright what i formerly
said. i love this list. thanks to all of you. sheila
_________________________________________________________________
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com