converting others to classical homeopathy
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2002 6:06 am
My humble suggestions to the classical homoeopath.
A. The ratio of homoeopaths world over to allopaths is trivial.
B. Annual growth rate of homoeopaths when compared with population
growth rate is insignificant.
C. Classical homoeopaths all over the world are minority compared to
total homoeopaths. (rather negligible)
D. In modern world number is strength. Our aim must be to increase the
homoeopathic population. We cannot expect any support from any government.
No government gives as much importance for homoeopathy as they give for
allopathy. We don°¶t have the lobby.
E. Hence, the responsibility of every homoeopath to train other to
increase the population of homoeopaths. If possible convert allopaths.
F. Classical homoeopaths must understand the difficulties of other
homoeopaths. Criticising, abusing, treating them outcast will reduce our
existing population. Please guide them, remove their ignorance, and prove
the efficacy of classical homoeopathy and by that change their mind.
Convert them to classical homoeopathy. Due to the defect in the educational
(homoeopathy), mostly institutionally qualified homoeopaths are not able to
practice classical homoeopathy. Nearby classical homoeopaths may guide them
and covert them. If each classical homoeopath converts 10 non-classical
homoeopaths per year, within few years classical homoeopaths will become
majority.
This is my ambition, rather my dream.
WITH BEST WISHES,
H.B.
With best wishes,
H.B.
from India
Dear H.B.,
Thank you for your reminder that serious classical homeopaths need to set
themselves the priority of recruiting others to our ranks, whether students,
other health practitioners, or those practicing other forms of homeopathy.
Do you have any suggestions about "guiding and converting" homeopaths? What
approaches have you found to be successful?
NASH (the North American Society of Homeopaths) has discussed the formation
of a speakers' bureau, which would send competent and convincing homeopaths
to give public talks in various communities. Sometimes an outside
representative of a larger organization receives more credibility than a
local practitioner trying to persuade others to change their ways. There
might be more receptivity to hearing the insights and experiences of an
individual who has no connection to local politics. I am hopeful about the
potential of this idea.
Blessings and warm wishes,
Charlotte
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
A. The ratio of homoeopaths world over to allopaths is trivial.
B. Annual growth rate of homoeopaths when compared with population
growth rate is insignificant.
C. Classical homoeopaths all over the world are minority compared to
total homoeopaths. (rather negligible)
D. In modern world number is strength. Our aim must be to increase the
homoeopathic population. We cannot expect any support from any government.
No government gives as much importance for homoeopathy as they give for
allopathy. We don°¶t have the lobby.
E. Hence, the responsibility of every homoeopath to train other to
increase the population of homoeopaths. If possible convert allopaths.
F. Classical homoeopaths must understand the difficulties of other
homoeopaths. Criticising, abusing, treating them outcast will reduce our
existing population. Please guide them, remove their ignorance, and prove
the efficacy of classical homoeopathy and by that change their mind.
Convert them to classical homoeopathy. Due to the defect in the educational
(homoeopathy), mostly institutionally qualified homoeopaths are not able to
practice classical homoeopathy. Nearby classical homoeopaths may guide them
and covert them. If each classical homoeopath converts 10 non-classical
homoeopaths per year, within few years classical homoeopaths will become
majority.
This is my ambition, rather my dream.
WITH BEST WISHES,
H.B.
With best wishes,
H.B.
from India
Dear H.B.,
Thank you for your reminder that serious classical homeopaths need to set
themselves the priority of recruiting others to our ranks, whether students,
other health practitioners, or those practicing other forms of homeopathy.
Do you have any suggestions about "guiding and converting" homeopaths? What
approaches have you found to be successful?
NASH (the North American Society of Homeopaths) has discussed the formation
of a speakers' bureau, which would send competent and convincing homeopaths
to give public talks in various communities. Sometimes an outside
representative of a larger organization receives more credibility than a
local practitioner trying to persuade others to change their ways. There
might be more receptivity to hearing the insights and experiences of an
individual who has no connection to local politics. I am hopeful about the
potential of this idea.
Blessings and warm wishes,
Charlotte
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]