Page 1 of 1

question re: sepia and Pulsatilla - inimical?

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 11:49 am
by Soroush Ebrahimi
Dear Erica

We have a number of such statements - eg re Phos and Causticum.

Then we have colleagues who report that they had prescribed Phos (or Caust)
first - did not do much good and switched to the other with good report.

My understanding is that the only reason you would switch from the first
remedy is that it has not worked. (and you have exhausted all sensible
potencies of it)
In that case if your repertorisation or other indication indicates the other
remedy, you need not have any worries.

Rgds
Soroush

Re: question re: sepia and Pulsatilla - inimical?

Posted: Sat Mar 17, 2007 1:55 pm
by ELM
Hi Soroush,
Thank you very much for your response. I should have reviewed my
notes regarding inimical and relationships! I appreciate the
explanation - very helpful.
Truly,
Erica

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Finrod" wrote:
(or Caust)
report.
first
sensible
the other

Re: question re: sepia and Pulsatilla - inimical?

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 12:15 am
by muthu kumar
Most of the time when symptoms point that way there is no mistake in
prescribing any of these- these relationships are not written in
stone and do not apply to all.

I have already written about this case here
a case of prolapse disc... pain 3 years- patient came kind of
stooping into clinic- main modality backache eructations -
Sepia 200 3 doses - put an end to that -
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Finrod" wrote:
(or Caust)
report.
first
sensible
the other
Behalf
Pulsatilla.
Homoeopathy and
regarding
document read
and/or
their use
its
incidental,
change your
single
15/03/2007
16/03/2007

Re: question re: sepia and Pulsatilla - inimical?

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 10:33 am
by Dr. Ioan Teleianu
It is true. Several times I said that between Puls and Sepia should exist another remedy which, for the moment, it is not discovered.
Dr. Ioan Teleianu
----------------------------------------------------
This mailbox protected from unsolicited email by Spam Alarm
from Dignity Software http://www.dignitysoftware.com

Re: question re: sepia and Pulsatilla - inimical?

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 11:22 am
by Jean Doherty
I thought Aristolochia according to Whitmont was that, Jean

Re: question re: sepia and Pulsatilla - inimical?

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 1:27 pm
by Shannon Nelson
I don't know about "between", but Chocolate is very similar to sepia.
Jeremy Sherr has estimated that 50% of sepia prescriptions actually
need chocolate.
Shannon

Re: question re: sepia and Pulsatilla - inimical?

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2007 9:21 pm
by Jean Doherty
Begin forwarded message:

Re: question re: sepia and Pulsatilla - inimical?

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 2:15 am
by Rosemary C. Hyde, Ph.D.
I can conceive of prescribing Sep or Puls in situations where female hormonal issues aren't the biggest focus of the case. However, I've always thought of Arist-cl as a remedy that specifically focuses on hormonal issues, that they need to be central (not the only symptoms, of course) for the remedy to be the simillimum. Is this a skewed view of it?
Thanks. Rosemary

Re: question re: sepia and Pulsatilla - inimical?

Posted: Wed Mar 21, 2007 7:53 am
by Jean Doherty
I believe that it is a good vulnerary and worked well for me on husband's finger recently on which the skin had got quite macerated under a splint, Best Wishes Jean