Minutus

Dr.Rozencwajg-

Who lays down these rules? it is each one according to the
circumstances prevalent and resources available. My belief is each one
is trying to practice good homeopathy given the set of circumstances
- is someone not using the latest computer software to select
medicines (and so cannot access the extra resources and analysis
capabilities that it provides) doing poor work compared to the one who
does? Is the one using Kent better than the one using Boenninghausen -
-- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Dr. J. Rozencwajg, MD, PhD,NMD."
wrote:
using
read
or less
pointed out,
helping the
emotional
must be
though we
pressure while
involved
is all of
indicated,
each
combine
makes sense
modalities
epidemics
prevention
give ALL
time to
a large
over...
mechanism
resolved by
case when
stages" is

I have been taught those rules, which are more strong suggestions, at one of
the many schools I attended, it was a French school of homeopathy practicing
a mix of unicism based on Boenninghausen's repertory essentially and of
pluralism/complexism based on clinical indications and this for that.
I do not understand your remark/question about poor or better practice......
..my point is that I tried to understand how different schools do practice
so that I can have a backup should I need one. As I have repeatedly written
here and on other lists, my duty is to the patient not to the practice, but
of course that implies a full understanding of what I do, not an automatic
application of remedies or techniques "because it works".
Dr. J. Rozencwajg, MD, PhD, NMD.
"The greatest enemy of any science is a closed mind".