Page 1 of 1

remedy reaction@Gail

Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 5:47 pm
by Gail
Thanks for this considered reply Chris,

It's very helpful. To let you know how this case unfolded - More
headaches were experienced - the client resorted to having panadol
rapid on hand. Her review appointment was for 3 weeks. After 2 weeks
she got her mother to phone and cancel the appointment. In all she
had seen the homoeopath 3 times at 3 week intervals - The first
prescription - Sepia LM3 daily had been generally helpful. The
second prescription - a movement to Sepia LM6 daily, coincided with
a sort of physical and emotional collapse. The third prescription -
a return to Sepia LM3 and the addition of Kali Phos LM3 both daily
coincided with these headaches. The patient's feeling was that this
homoeopath just knew how to make money out of people. The
appointments were priced quite highly, as were the remedies - so on
each remedy change more money went to the homoeopath's pocket. She
also began to wonder about whether if a person was in a weakened
state a remedy could actually result in a death. When the mother
explained about the headaches the homoeopath said - "She should have
phoned me about it", which apparently felt like he was passing off
his responsibility as he hadn't established this requirement with
the patient during the consultations.

Thanks to others who have taken the time to consider and share
around this - I've certainly learned a lot from it and I hope others
have too.
Gail.

--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, "Chris Gillen"
wrote:
prescribed
treatment at
may
practice
like
reactions.
we can
primary action
occasions
time) this
intensely in
a good
as the
patient.
caused by
is
physical
repetition of
secondary
responds
to produce
repetition of the
produced
the Vital
combination remedy
effects with
Rhus tox)
effects
cancelled
regard to
that they
(Hering). Kali
Force is
is the best
instinctively for
preservation
is doing
because we are
the known
mentioning
have its
information
how in
knowing
homoeopathic
beginning to
because
time
withdrawal
could
she

Re: remedy reaction@Gail

Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:37 pm
by Kerry
Dear Chris

You mention a proving of a combination remedy: Bryonia and Rhus. Do you
know whether information on that proving is available anywhere online?
It would be handy to have in order to show the problems that can occur
when combinations are given.

Many thanks
Kerry

prescribed
at
practice
can
action
occasions
this
intensely in
good
the
patient.
by
physical
repetition
secondary
responds
the
produced
Vital
with
effects
to
that they
Kali
Force is
the best
for
self-preservation
doing
are
known
mentioning
have its
knowing

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.5/451 - Release Date:
19/09/2006

Re: remedy reaction@Gail

Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 7:02 am
by Kerry
Many thanks for the info Chris.

Kerry

online?
occur
Journal
2004.
Homoeopathy
any
this
out of
site or its
incidental, special,
your
single
19/09/2006

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.7/454 - Release Date:
21/09/2006

Re: remedy reaction@Gail

Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 3:03 am
by muthu kumar
The antidotal relationship between remedies - is it static? Once
again these are antidotal only "where symptoms agree" - right?
It is only a general observation - not invariable or inevitable...
--- In minutus@yahoogroups.com, Fran Sheffield
wrote:
regarding
am
combos
other -
shared by
Rhus. Do you
online?
can occur
in 'Similia, Journal
April 2004.
a
effects
component
over
the
acute

Re: remedy reaction@Gail

Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 5:03 am
by Fran Sheffield
Hello hahnemannian2002,

Sunday, October 8, 2006, 11:03:05 AM, you wrote:

h> The antidotal relationship between remedies - is it static? Once
h> again these are antidotal only "where symptoms agree" - right?
h> It is only a general observation - not invariable or inevitable...

Yes indeed. This is why I wonder if the limited number of symptoms
that occurred with the provings of the 2 potencies was because an
anti-dotal effect occurred. Interestingly, there were no joint
symptoms at all from the provings yet these are associated with Rhus
and Bry. The article also states:

"However, not one characteristic remedy picture predominated over the
other. For example there was no indication whether symptoms were
ameliorated or aggravated from motion."

Of further interest, not a lot of symptoms emerged from the 30C group
whereas 80% of the 200C group experienced symptoms.
--
Best regards,
Fran mailto:FranSheffield@homeopathyplus.com.au

Re: remedy reaction@Gail

Posted: Sun Oct 08, 2006 10:13 pm
by Luise Kunkle
On Sun, 8 Oct 2006, hahnemannian2002 wrote:

I just read in one of v. Boenninghausen's cases - in his first
detailed casebook, to be published some time in the future, that he
let the patient smell campher to antidote; it did not make any
difference (it appears that often it did work).

Regards

Luise

--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========