Radar Vs MacRep/RefWorks
Posted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 3:56 am
Dear Andy et all,
I am looking for some recent opinions on the differences between
Radar and MacRep/RefWorks. I understand that there will be a certain
degree of discussion amongst the archive files from previous queries
but I believe the MacRep/RefWorks has undergone a recent upgrade. Do
you (or anyone else on list) have time to give a brief outline on
what you consider the most useful in each program and what are the cons?
I know in the past some have said that they like both because they
offer different things but what are those differences? If you had to
choose between one of them which would you keep and why? I am
processing what path to take as my current Radar program is just not
good enough and has caused me some grief.
I have a baseline Radar program that IS a Mac version. Radar used to
make a Mac version about 5-6 yrs ago, just before EH became
available, that included exLibris. However, much to my dismay, Radar
discontinued supporting Mac soon after I made my purchase and I was
no longer able to upgrade it or move up to EH etc. As I already had
the Mac Radar 7 program I didn't wish to go the Virtual PC (VPC)
route and have to change it all at extra expense at that time.
I've also been disatisfied with Radar. I loaded my program the 1st
time with difficulty because of a badly unbalanced CD installer (the
3rd CD of several) and I returned to have replaced. Instead of
issuing me a new copy of the CD, a lable was simply pasted directly
over the existing lable of the original CD that was already off
kilter in exactly the same position, so consequently it came back
even worse. I got the program to install the once with a horribly
wobbling CD but when my hard drive died a few years later and I had
that replaced, I was unable to get my machine to accept that
particular CD again for reinstallation. After my previous experience
(and others), rather than look to Radar for help on this matter for
an outdated program, I managed to find another way to copy enough
files from that CD to the 70% part-loaded program to allow it to run.
I am keen to upgrade now but due to the poor support from Radar I am
quite hesitant. I would also need to upgrade my Mac to the new intel
model so that I can run Windows (rather than VPC) to run Radar more
satisfactorily. I appreciate that Radar has grown over the years and
should run much better now than what I am used to etc but I am
seriously looking at changing to MacRep/RefWorks seeing as I will
probably have to buy the complete program all over again.
So if anyone can offer any thoughts I would GREATLY APPRECIATE IT!!!
Oh...and trying the different demos of different Homoeopathic
programs (except Mac) isn't an option until I can afford to upgrade
my Mac to an intel Mac.
Thanking you Kindly,
Tan.
NB: Email advice is not a substitute for medical or veterinary
treatment!
~Tanya Nolte~
Reg'd Classical Homoeopath & Holistic Animal Practitioner
http://www.naturaltherapypages.com.au/therapist/1971
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I am looking for some recent opinions on the differences between
Radar and MacRep/RefWorks. I understand that there will be a certain
degree of discussion amongst the archive files from previous queries
but I believe the MacRep/RefWorks has undergone a recent upgrade. Do
you (or anyone else on list) have time to give a brief outline on
what you consider the most useful in each program and what are the cons?
I know in the past some have said that they like both because they
offer different things but what are those differences? If you had to
choose between one of them which would you keep and why? I am
processing what path to take as my current Radar program is just not
good enough and has caused me some grief.
I have a baseline Radar program that IS a Mac version. Radar used to
make a Mac version about 5-6 yrs ago, just before EH became
available, that included exLibris. However, much to my dismay, Radar
discontinued supporting Mac soon after I made my purchase and I was
no longer able to upgrade it or move up to EH etc. As I already had
the Mac Radar 7 program I didn't wish to go the Virtual PC (VPC)
route and have to change it all at extra expense at that time.
I've also been disatisfied with Radar. I loaded my program the 1st
time with difficulty because of a badly unbalanced CD installer (the
3rd CD of several) and I returned to have replaced. Instead of
issuing me a new copy of the CD, a lable was simply pasted directly
over the existing lable of the original CD that was already off
kilter in exactly the same position, so consequently it came back
even worse. I got the program to install the once with a horribly
wobbling CD but when my hard drive died a few years later and I had
that replaced, I was unable to get my machine to accept that
particular CD again for reinstallation. After my previous experience
(and others), rather than look to Radar for help on this matter for
an outdated program, I managed to find another way to copy enough
files from that CD to the 70% part-loaded program to allow it to run.
I am keen to upgrade now but due to the poor support from Radar I am
quite hesitant. I would also need to upgrade my Mac to the new intel
model so that I can run Windows (rather than VPC) to run Radar more
satisfactorily. I appreciate that Radar has grown over the years and
should run much better now than what I am used to etc but I am
seriously looking at changing to MacRep/RefWorks seeing as I will
probably have to buy the complete program all over again.
So if anyone can offer any thoughts I would GREATLY APPRECIATE IT!!!
Oh...and trying the different demos of different Homoeopathic
programs (except Mac) isn't an option until I can afford to upgrade
my Mac to an intel Mac.
Thanking you Kindly,
Tan.
NB: Email advice is not a substitute for medical or veterinary
treatment!
~Tanya Nolte~
Reg'd Classical Homoeopath & Holistic Animal Practitioner
http://www.naturaltherapypages.com.au/therapist/1971
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]