Page 1 of 1

aids and susceptibility - a hypothesis

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2001 2:21 pm
by Joy Lucas
Just a few thoughts....

It is a well known fact that syphilis and gonorrhea were deeply suppressed
during the first and second world wars (not sure what drugs were used but
mercury might have been involved).

Children and grand children born from this suppression may then have gone on
to develop illness which required heavy doses of antibiotics, which in turn
suppressed even further.

It is easy to imagine that such suppression would result in damaged mucosa
(in any area of the body) which is what is required for HIV and AIDS to take
hold. Without the damaged mucosa the susceptibility probably wouldn't
survive or maybe show itself as some other dis-eased state.

Regards, Joy Lucas
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

Re: aids and susceptibility - a hypothesis

Posted: Fri Dec 07, 2001 2:36 pm
by Soroush Ebrahimi
In support of this, there are some tissues which are particularly
susceptible.

Men who have been circumcised rarely get the infection from Heterosexual
intercourse with a female who is HIV.
It has been shown that the underside of the foreskin is the entry point of
the HIV.

If I remember correctly Harris Coulter says in his book that those who
developed full blown Aids have often had several encounters with VD and
obviously the allopathic suppression after wards.

Rgds
Soroush

Re: aids and susceptibility - a hypothesis

Posted: Tue Dec 11, 2001 9:25 pm
by USAHomeopath@aol.com
This information has recentlybeen discounted. What IS known is that in
Africa, the tribes that circumsize have less incidence of AIDS, but there are
many other factors and customs that are also different in these groups, so
there has been no accurate testing of this hypothesis.
Melanie

>